Search for: "Scott v. Scott et al" Results 441 - 460 of 810
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2010, 2:32 pm by J
A landlord is not usually liable for acts of nuisance by his tenants unless he has, for example, encouraged to approved of the nuisance behaviour: see Smith v Scott [1973] Ch 314; Hussain v Lancaster CC [2000] 1 QB 1 and Mowam v LB Wandsworth [2001] 33 HLR 56. [read post]
With the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit having struck down Rule 14a-11 in Business Roundtable et al v. [read post]
22 Jun 2019, 7:14 am
After complex litigation between the parties about an allegedly simple failure to give (an arguably unnecessary) notice, Vice Chancellor Glasscock, in Vintage Rodeo Parent LLC, et al v Rent-A-Center, determined that R-A-C need not go through with the sale even though the parties (at the time) had appeared to understand that the end date would be extended and had continued to work on satisfying the other closing conditions. [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 3:01 am by Walter Olson
[Knight Institute symposium with Jack Goldsmith et al.] [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 2:03 pm by Matt Rita
Then again, if Pennsylvania were to become one of the growing number of states to propose laws against workplace bullying, we could soon see the case of Kevin Malone, et al. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
(Bar La Folie), 2014 QCTDP 13Juridiction : Tribunal des droits de la personne (T.D.P.Q.), Montréal, 500-53-000347-110Décision de : Juge Scott Hughes, Me Claudine Ouellet et Me Luc Huppé, assesseursDate : 30 mai 2014 DROITS ET LIBERTÉS — droit à l’égalité — actes discriminatoires — fourniture de biens ou de services — homme de race noire — portier — refus de donner… [read post]
17 Oct 2007, 2:22 pm
In response to Scott Dodson’s piece on Bowles v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 5:11 pm
SCOGGINS; from Hidalgo County; 13th district (13-06-00368-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 12-20-07)08-0276 DANIEL ROEHRS, ET AL. v. [read post]