Search for: "Self v. Laws"
Results 441 - 460
of 16,881
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Feb 2024, 5:00 am
States have also tried to go to court to enforce these laws in cases like Arizona v. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 11:30 am
The Supreme Court's unanimous landmark decision in Brown v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 2:59 pm
Graham v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 1:37 pm
Property v. property: TM v. domain names; land v. chattels; IP v. consumer goods. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 1:14 pm
ShareThe Supreme Court will hear oral arguments on Thursday in what is shaping up to be the biggest election case since its ruling nearly 25 years ago in Bush v. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 6:51 am
Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Trump v. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 2:30 am
Supreme Court's consideration of the issues presented in the Trump v. [read post]
Hunter’s Heroic Epic: Biden Files Motion Comparing Himself to Dead Romanovs and Ancient Greek Heroes
1 Feb 2024, 6:06 am
Hunter v. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 6:05 am
” In the 2012 touchstone decision Arizona v. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 5:50 am
In the Gambia v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 7:50 pm
Ann Lipton – Business Law Prof Blog: “On Tuesday, Chancellor Kathaleen McCormick of the Delaware Court of Chancery issued her long-awaited opinion in Tornetta v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 2:30 pm
But, as explained in Counterman v. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] Students for Justice in Palestine at Univ. of Florida Denied Preliminary Injunction,
31 Jan 2024, 11:47 am
Fla.) in Students for Justice in Palestine at Univ. of Florida v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 6:22 am
”[6] In its 2018 final rule, the ATF interpreted “single function of the trigger” to mean “a single pull of the trigger”[7] and “automatically” to mean “as the result of a self-acting or self-regulating mechanism that allows the firing of multiple rounds through a single pull of the trigger,”[8] thereby including bump stocks in the definition of a machine gun. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 2:46 am
Spence v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
A respondent’s denial of liability in a consent agreement does not diminish staff’s extensive investigation or the ability of the Commission to find a reasonable basis to finalize a settlement or to enforce an order that results from settlement negotiations.[20] The FTC’s Consent Order Procedures explicitly allow settlement agreements to “state that the signing thereof is for settlement purposes only and does not constitute an admission by any party that the… [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 11:53 am
Turning to case law, the Appellate Division relied on Shah v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 11:11 am
From Park v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:50 am
Askanase v. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 4:35 pm
It would be utterly self-funded too with the price horn commands within the existing markets, with many many thousands of dollars changing hand within this vile trade. [read post]
