Search for: "Sharpe v. Department of Justice"
Results 441 - 460
of 515
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2010, 10:20 am
Turow reports his public vindication from charges of unethical conduct and provides as evidence a statement by the public integrity section of the Justice Department that he and his superiors in the Justice Department had not violated any law, he shows a blindness to the issues he addresses. [read post]
18 May 2010, 8:18 am
Some conservatives say foreign practices are irrelevant to U.S. law.Undaunted, Justice Kennedy used his opinion in Monday's case, Graham v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 5:49 am
Department of Justice attorney Warren E. [read post]
17 May 2010, 4:07 am
Department of Justice attorney Warren E. [read post]
16 May 2010, 5:25 pm
In sharp contrast, Justice Stevens invariably manifested statist thinking about the property rights of individuals. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 9:22 am
United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 5:30 am
Justice Stevens provided the moment last week during argument in Magwood v. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 2:32 pm
The Justice Department, in response, urged the Justices to bypass Skilling’s case or, at most, to hold it for action until after it decided the Black case on the scope of the “honest services” law. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 11:31 pm
Lawsuit for libel brought against public official turns on whether the statements objected to were uttered with “actual malice”Shulman v Hunderfund, 12 NY3d 143In the words of Justice Smith, “In this action for libel by a public figure, the record does not clearly and convincingly show that the statements in question were made with "actual malice," as required by New York Times Co. v Sullivan (376 US 254 [1964]). [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 7:30 am
” The Department of Justice filed a brief Friday urging the Court to dismiss Kiyemba v. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 6:32 am
The topic was revived as a news item by President Obama's sharp criticism of the decision in his State of the Union address last night. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 3:53 am
Sharp readers — and do I have any other kind? [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 3:22 pm
Taking into consideration the cases of A v United Kingdom (3455/05) (2009) 49 EHRR 29 ECHR (Grand Chamber) and Secretary of State for the Home Department v F (2009) UKHL 28, (2009) 3 WLR 74, the claimants’ arguments on this point were upheld. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 4:43 am
And I was proud that we have such sharp minds on the bench, even though I don't agree with all of the views expressed. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 5:10 am
 JUSTICE DEPARTMENTS (89%); LAW COURTS & TRIBUNALS (89%);  ... ... [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 2:35 pm
Not since 1988, when Justice Scalia dissented alone as the Court (in Morrison v. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 6:04 am
 “The Justice Department now acts as a kind of counterweight to corporate power,†said Frank O. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 5:34 am
In United States v. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 1:23 am
Sharpe of the Prince Law Offices Commonwealth v. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 5:40 pm
Florida, being argued at 10, and Sullivan v. [read post]
