Search for: "Short v. Davis " Results 441 - 460 of 965
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2016, 6:00 am
Freed, Center for Political Accountability, on Friday, February 26, 2016 Tags: Accountability, Citizens United v. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 9:25 pm by Jeff Redding
  In short, the argument is that Kim Davis’ marriage licenses are ‘so very important’ because of the material benefits accompanying marriage—indeed, because of these benefits, marriage licenses can be seen as a kind of paper money. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 6:22 am
Dickey, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, on Wednesday, February 3, 2016 Tags: Class actions, Delaware cases, Delaware law, Derivative suits, Erica John Fund v. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 3:09 am by Broc Romanek
This Cooley blog recaps this letter from BlackRock’s CEO to 500 companies about being wary of short-termism (as noted in this Davis Polk blog, the letter also urges companies to scrap quarterly earnings guidance). [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 1:09 pm by Orin Kerr
This is the Court’s first exclusionary rule case since Davis v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:21 am by Ken White
Davis, 454 U.S. 370 (1982) (per curiam) (upholding a forty-year sentence for possession of nine ounces of marijuana with the intent to distribute); Rummel v. [read post]
29 Nov 2015, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
On Tuesday 24 November 2015 there was a directions hearing in the case of Lakova v Tymula & Longmuir before Nicola Davies J. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 6:27 am by Joy Waltemath
But in this case, the plaintiff teacher’s ADA discrimination claim failed on other grounds: There was no evidence that the school was motivated by discriminatory animus when, after her car accident, it split the annual bonus between her and the substitute teacher who had filled in for her during her four-month absence (Davis v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am by David Kris
Today, for reasons both technological and political, there is an increasing divergence and growing conflict between U.S. and foreign laws that compel, and prohibit, production of data in response to governmental surveillance directives.[1][2]  Major U.S. telecommunications and Internet providers[3] face escalating pressure from foreign governments, asserting foreign law, to require production of data stored by the providers in the United States, in ways that violate U.S. law.[4]  At the… [read post]