Search for: "Smith v. General Services Administration"
Results 441 - 460
of 753
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Sep 2011, 4:32 pm
Although the late entry of defense counsel into the case may provide the required reasonable excuse for delay in service of the notice of alibi ( see, People v. [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:16 pm
Sibelius v. [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 11:30 am
Smith that the free exercise clause generally requires no religious exemptions from laws that are neutral and generally applicable. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 8:15 am
Smith English only Environment Environment Environmental justice epidemics Epperson v. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 3:08 pm
App. 61a) that an Administrative Law Judge had granted. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 1:42 pm
Blume v. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 1:44 am
Another favorite was BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 1:22 pm
Supreme Court decision in Plyler v. [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 11:49 am
Dmitry Karshtedt: Overlap with constitutional issues in patent: resolution of claims in administrative proceeding. [read post]
31 May 2021, 6:47 am
Choice of venue rules are mainly utilised for geographical and administrative convenience. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 7:00 am
The America Invents Act brings in many changes, but it is no giant leap for improving confidence that the patent system helps to generate quality inventions. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 12:28 am
The judgment to be appealed is that of the Court of Appeal Civil Division in Ministry of Defence v AB and others[2010] EWCA Civ 1317 – (Smith and Leveson LJJ and Sir Mark Waller). [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 3:40 pm
In Sherbert v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 11:17 am
” Here, the Biden administration agrees to Payne’s request for vacatur, although it opposes Payne’s additional request for further consideration in light of Axon Enterprise, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 9:21 am
Duke Power Co. and Smith v. [read post]
26 Nov 2023, 4:55 am
John Melville-Smith, Lexology: It’s all in a single word…: When can a marriage be said to have been “solemnised”? [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 10:15 am
All academic, general, and professional audiences. -- V. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 11:46 am
It’s as if they were written in invisible ink—legible to the phone companies and Internet service providers who execute them, yet imperceptible to unsuspecting targets, the general public, and even other arms of government, most notably Congress and the appellate courts.[12] The SCA is by far the least transparent of ECPA’s three titles. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 6:50 am
We would like to trumpet the court’s recent decision in Rodriguez v. [read post]
