Search for: "Smith v. United States Department of Justice" Results 441 - 460 of 779
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Dec 2016, 1:30 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
To achieve the vital goal of substantially reforming existing food systems in the United States in the context of changing climatic, political, and sociolegal conditions, the panelists will articulate their visions of the centrality of interracial justice to confronting food oppression and cultivating Furthering Liberty for People With Disabilities Post- Meyer v. [read post]
27 Dec 2016, 8:16 am by Kate Tummarello
Most recently, we saw a troubling decision out of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in the case United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 12:25 am by INFORRM
The biggest story in the world this week was of course the election of Donald Trump as the next President of the United States. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 2:32 pm by John Elwood
United States overruled United States v. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 8:00 am by Dan Ernst
FailingerDenying the Poor Access to Court: United States v. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 1:54 pm by Eugene Volokh
After all, there are very few courts of equity left in the United States. [read post]
17 Jul 2016, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the Department of Justice (DOJ) can’t use a U.S. search warrant to access customer data stored overseas. [read post]
16 Jul 2016, 5:07 am by David Kris
” The foreign government must have adopted “procedures to minimize the acquisition, retention and dissemination of information concerning United States persons subject to the agreement. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 1:26 pm by Alexandra Gutierrez
In that capacity, he will represent the United States before the Supreme Court for the next few months. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 10:18 am by John Elwood
United States, 15-8629, and Beckles v. [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 11:05 pm
 A similar story was recently told before Mrs Justice Slade in the Queens Bench Division in Arthur J Gallagher Services and others v Skriptchenko and Others [2016] EWHC 603. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 8:06 am by Ross Runkel
United States decision to reach the conclusion that the district court’s failure to mention “prejudice” in its dismissal order does not bar a second proceeding. [read post]