Search for: "South Carolina Supreme Court"
Results 441 - 460
of 4,539
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Aug 2021, 6:52 am
A magistrate has been suspended for six months with anger management counseling by the South Carolina Supreme Court On May 14, 2020, the Chief Magistrate for Florence County scheduled a meeting with the magistrates and clerks to discuss the Covid-19... [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 7:22 pm
Supreme Court, appellate defense attorney Robert Dudek said Tuesday. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 5:07 am
Supreme Court": This article appears today in The State of Columbia, South Carolina. [read post]
9 May 2015, 2:35 pm
"Over Barbecue in South Carolina, Rick Perry Hypes Supreme Court as Defining 2016 Issue; The Texan warns voters in the early primary state that Hillary Clinton could remake the Supreme Court": Sahil Kapur of Bloomberg Politics has this report. [read post]
28 Aug 2007, 5:06 am
Strickland, the South Carolina Supreme Court held that although the equitable nature of laches generally comports with the family court's equitable jurisdiction in determining support and maintenance between former spouses, the concept of "inexcusable delay" in the laches defense is inconsistent with the judicial authority inherent in a court order. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 6:32 am
SAID, University of South Carolina School of Law. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 11:02 am
On April 18, 2018, almost four months after the South Carolina Supreme Court remanded the appeal of Stoney v. [read post]
27 Aug 2016, 4:42 am
A one-year suspension was imposed by the South Carolina Supreme Court for an attorney's federal criminal conviction. [read post]
6 May 2011, 3:52 pm
The Supreme Court of our State has finally put a stop to the ridiculous processes that passed for the 'practice' of law at South Carolina foreclosure mills. [read post]
6 May 2011, 3:52 pm
The Supreme Court of our State has finally put a stop to the ridiculous processes that passed for the 'practice' of law at South Carolina foreclosure mills. [read post]
30 Nov 2007, 8:41 am
An editorial in Tuesday's edition of TheState.com takes the South Carolina Supreme Court to task for its conduct in the recent controversy over the decision to admit 20 applicants who had been notified that they had failed the bar exam.... [read post]
3 Sep 2017, 5:47 pm
[Note: For background to this post, please read its predecessor here.]After the Motion to Recuse and Vacate discussed in the previous post, the petition for rehearing heaps on many more reasons why the South Carolina Supreme Court should place no confidence in its divided result in the Episcopal Diocese of South Carolina case. [read post]
3 Sep 2017, 5:47 pm
[Note: For background to this post, please read its predecessor here.]After the Motion to Recuse and Vacate discussed in the previous post, the petition for rehearing heaps on many more reasons why the South Carolina Supreme Court should place no confidence in its divided result in the Episcopal Diocese of South Carolina case. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 12:57 pm
The Decision of the Supreme Court of South Carolina The court reversed, holding that there was no evidence that the plaintiff had suffered anything less than a 50% impairment to his back. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 12:08 pm
State, the South Carolina Supreme Court dealt with the issue of whether a defendant who pleads guilty may also waive his rights to collateral review. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 6:55 am
The South Carolina Supreme Court imposed a nine-month suspension of an attorney who had returned to South Carolina after a decade of practice based on his admission in New York and New Jersey. [read post]
24 May 2021, 8:29 am
South Carolina Supreme Court Historical Society Podcast The Historical Society and the SC Bar Foundation post interviews with highly respected lawyers and judges from the Palmetto State, including UofSC Law Library’s own Sarah Leverette. [read post]
22 May 2024, 6:04 am
Last month, the US Supreme Court allowed a gender-affirming care ban for minors in Idaho to go into effect, while the governor of Kansas vetoed a state ban on such care. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 10:33 am
The statutory elective share previously was limited to the “probate estate” pursuant to South Carolina Code §62-2-201 and §62-2-202, but was expanded by the South Carolina Supreme Court in Seifert v. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 4:39 am
In this landmark Commerce Clause case, the Supreme Court affirmed that Congress' power to regulate local, intrastate matters is boundless. [read post]
