Search for: "South Carolina v. United States" Results 441 - 460 of 1,414
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Aug 2022, 9:05 pm by Dan Flynn
AUSTIN — The timeline played the starring role during the opening arguments at the jury trial of the United States v Paul Kruse. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 10:35 am by Aurora Barnes
United States 18-1344 Issue: Whether a suppression court may consider (1) only information contained within the four corners of the warrant application, as the U.S. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 9:26 am by ToddHenderson
Or, looking at the issue another way, does the fact that the conduct permitted by Citizens United was legal in 26 states prior to Citizens United, suggest that politicians are hopelessly corrupt in over half our states? [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 5:14 am by Robert Kreisman
  Voting in America is a precious right; eligibility is established in the United States Constitution, its amendments, by state laws and by various acts of Congress. [read post]
17 May 2010, 5:49 am by Lawrence Solum
Justice Clark read his opinion for the Court in United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 3:31 pm by Rick Hasen
Lane, 66 Ohio State Law Journal 177 (2005) The California Recall Punch Card Litigation: Why Bush v. [read post]
25 May 2009, 5:18 pm
  The State argues Neither the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution nor the doctrine of preemption obligate state courts to enforce an otherwise valid order of any United States Bankruptcy Court where such order is challenged under the successor liability law of the states. [read post]
16 Mar 2014, 4:34 pm by Jack Pringle
”Because there is no South Carolina precedent addressing the “evident partiality” ground to vacate an award found in S.C. [read post]
16 Mar 2014, 4:34 pm by Jack Pringle
”Because there is no South Carolina precedent addressing the “evident partiality” ground to vacate an award found in S.C. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 6:12 am by Brian A. Comer
J&J’s 4.95 percent bonds due in 2033 fell 1.36 percent to 102.3 cents on the dollar, according to Trace, the bond-price reporting system of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.The case is State of South Carolina v. [read post]
2 Feb 2013, 2:19 pm by Jack Pringle
IntroductionThe South Carolina Supreme Court recently issued Dunes West Golf Club v. [read post]
2 Feb 2013, 2:19 pm by Jack Pringle
IntroductionThe South Carolina Supreme Court recently issued Dunes West Golf Club v. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 4:35 pm by Colin O'Keefe
 Benjamin Stevens of The Stevens Firm on their South Carolina Family Law Blog April Fools Gags on Air? [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  This entailed that even a so-called “sovereign state” like South Carolina was without power to regulate who could serve as members of the ship’s crew. [read post]