Search for: "Spain v. State"
Results 441 - 460
of 1,277
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Oct 2019, 5:02 am
It should also be noted that Google used geo-blocking to stop a user apparently in an EU Member State from accessing the content de-referenced in the Google search page in his/her Member State through a search page of a non-EU Member State where the content was not de-referenced. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 2:46 pm
Boal v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 6:15 am
Oh, and if you're wondering, I'm rooting for the United States, but tend to think that Spain will be the big winner. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 1:38 am
The shadow of Lautsi v. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 12:35 am
The Court tends to follow the guidance of the Advocate General – although famously in Google Spain v Costeja itself they did not. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 11:18 am
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit decision in El-Hady v. [read post]
26 Jun 2016, 11:37 am
”.Member States of the EU differ on the answer to the question (e.g., Spain— “yes”; Germany— “no”). [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 4:25 pm
The controversy finally made its way to the Texas Supreme Court in 1928, in Greene v. [read post]
28 Dec 2014, 11:42 am
In Edwards v. [read post]
21 Jul 2019, 11:53 am
China, Germany, Spain, etc.) may be enforced in any other contracting state (e.g. the United States, Canada, Mexico, etc.). [read post]
17 May 2010, 4:51 pm
It has doubts as to whether the provision which is applicable in the Kingdom of Spain, pursuant to which the private copying levy is charged indiscriminately on digital reproduction equipment, devices and media, can be regarded as compatible with the directive. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 1:05 am
Article 3 states that an SPC shall be granted with respect to a product if the product is (a) protected by a patent, and (b) the subject of a granted marketing authorisation. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 4:19 am
In respect of the aircraft branding, the Member States overflown were France and Spain, and so (despite easyGroup's counsel's valiant attempts to steer the court away from the lex specialis EUTMR jurisdictional provisions and towards Brussels Recast) the English court had no jurisdiction over ATR. [read post]
20 Nov 2008, 11:01 am
On this day in ...... 1893 (115 years ago today), in United States v. [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 5:01 am
In Palko v. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 3:41 am
Private copying levy systems are not harmonised in the EU, and some Member States do not even collect levies or decided to get rid of them altogether. [read post]
10 Nov 2013, 6:46 pm
In particular, it could provide an answer to the various problems that are anticipated to develop in the United States following the recent Supreme Court decisions in Oxford Health Plans LLC v. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 2:25 am
Since posting this update, we understand that there have been further developments in several EU27 Member States as to the temporary transitional measures that are available, and we have updated our summary table to reflect these developments. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 1:15 am
Home Office v Essop & Ors; Naeem v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 14-15 November 2016. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 4:18 am
Sagarra Inversiones, S.L. v. [read post]
