Search for: "Sparks v. State"
Results 441 - 460
of 1,550
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2019, 4:54 am
This sparked speculation on whether the state would apply for adequacy under the GDPR. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 8:58 pm
Necessity being the mother of invention, automotive technology progressed rapidly, and cars overtook horses on city roads in the 1920s, sparking a national economic boom, but also new challenges for roads and infrastructure. [read post]
13 Jul 2019, 6:00 am
Durand v. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 3:49 pm
In United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 7:46 am
This revenue source sparks the interest of several states which impose excise taxes and licensing fees on fireworks sales, although almost all states also impose fees on fireworks sellers. [read post]
29 Jun 2019, 4:40 am
In Thomas v Brown and Tennant [1997] FCA 215, the Federal Court of Australia ultimately found that Mr Thomas was the author of the Artistic Work, and thus the owner of the bundle of rights subsisting in it. [read post]
29 Jun 2019, 4:38 am
It was held that the work only needed to “possess more than a de minimis quantum of creativity”, and no copyright could be found in a work where “the creative spark is utterly lacking or so trivial as to be virtually non-existent. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 11:11 am
Sarah Grant dissected the Ninth Circuit’s ruling in Karnoski v. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 8:26 am
Original works of authorship The Review Board set out that its decision was based on the “low standard of copyrightability” set out in Feist Publications v Rural Telephone Service Co., (499 U.S. 340 (1991), requiring a “minimal creative spark”). [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 12:26 am
Rideshare drivers in Los Angeles were the first to spark a recent strike, with those in many other cities soon following. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 2:11 pm
Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes noted in Biddle v. [read post]
28 May 2019, 11:42 am
Supreme Court held in Star Athletica, LLC v. [read post]
21 May 2019, 4:00 am
In the notorious 1959 Roncarelli v. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 8:34 pm
In 2005, the Supreme Court ruled in Kelo v. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 5:30 am
Even before the CCPA was signed into law, the bill sparked speculation about whether California could apply under the GDPR for adequacy. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 7:16 am
The Assange indictment may seem reminiscent of the Pentagon Papers case, New York Times Co v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 5:02 am
" Tucker v. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 11:23 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 11:23 am
United States v. [read post]
