Search for: "Spencer v Spencer"
Results 441 - 460
of 1,275
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jan 2016, 10:03 am
More recently, the Supreme Court considered the general rules governing the implication of terms into contracts, in the case of Marks and Spencer plc v BNP Paribas Securities Services Trust Company (Jersey) Limited & Anor [2015] UKSC 72 (Case Comment here). [read post]
29 Dec 2015, 8:06 pm
Amendola v Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of West Haven, 2015 WL 8134019 (CT App. 12/15/2015)Filed under: Current Caselaw, Variances [read post]
20 Dec 2015, 3:25 pm
Spencer Sales, 786 So.2d 570, 572-73 (Fla.2001) (same). [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 12:52 pm
In King v. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 9:13 pm
Spencer Taylor intervened in the appeal to the trial court, raising concerns related to the environmental impact of the proposed subdivision. [read post]
8 Dec 2015, 9:17 am
In Marks and Spencer plc v BNP Paribas Securities Services Trust Company (Jersey) Limited & Anor, the Supreme Court has given judgments that will not be welcomed by the tenant community. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 2:26 am
Lord Neuberger stated that the conclusion of the Court of Appeal in Ellis v Rowbotham [1900] 1 QB 740 that the 1870 Act did not apply to rent payable in advance, is correct. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 1:00 am
Marks & Spencer Plc v BNP Paribas Securities Services Trust Company (Jersey) Ltd & Anor, heard 7 October 2015. [read post]
Once again, the RCMP calls for warrantless access to your online info. Once again, the RCMP is wrong
26 Nov 2015, 4:07 am
The Supreme Court of Canada, in R v. [read post]
22 Nov 2015, 3:00 am
Marks & Spencer Plc v BNP Paribas Securities Services Trust Company (Jersey) Ltd & Anor, heard 7 October 2015. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 1:00 am
On 7 October 2015 the Supreme Court heard the case of Marks and Spencer plc v. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 7:00 am
Marks & Spencer Plc v BNP Paribas Securities Services Trust Company (Jersey) Ltd & Anor, heard 7 October 2015. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 3:01 am
The second case is Luis v. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 1:00 am
Marks & Spencer Plc v BNP Paribas Securities Services Trust Company (Jersey) Ltd & Anor, heard 7 October 2015. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 12:32 pm
Reasons for judgement were released today by the BC Supreme Court, New Westminster Registry, (Gonopolsky v. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 1:00 am
Marks & Spencer Plc v BNP Paribas Securities Services Trust Company (Jersey) Ltd & Anor, heard 7 October 2015. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 7:48 am
Connection between liquid sugar consumption and greater health problems v. solid food. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 5:29 am
The following speaker was Chris Hoole, who talked about a spin-off topic from the epic litigation between Interflora and Marks & Spencer over keywords [for a flavour of which, check out the IPKat here] -- the concept of "negative matching". [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 7:13 am
Marks & Spencer Plc v BNP Paribas Securities Services Trust Company (Jersey) Ltd & Anor, heard 7 October 2015. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 4:38 am
In the Interflora case, part of the allegation of trade mark infringement was that Marks & Spencer did not employ negative matching when using, among other words and generic terms, the keyword which also constituted its trade mark Interflora. [read post]
