Search for: "Spencer v. Spencer" Results 441 - 460 of 1,268
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Nov 2015, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Marks & Spencer Plc v BNP Paribas Securities Services Trust Company (Jersey) Ltd & Anor, heard 7 October 2015. [read post]
22 Nov 2015, 3:00 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Marks & Spencer Plc v BNP Paribas Securities Services Trust Company (Jersey) Ltd & Anor, heard 7 October 2015. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 7:00 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Marks & Spencer Plc v BNP Paribas Securities Services Trust Company (Jersey) Ltd & Anor, heard 7 October 2015. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 3:01 am by Amy Howe
The second case is Luis v. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Marks & Spencer Plc v BNP Paribas Securities Services Trust Company (Jersey) Ltd & Anor, heard 7 October 2015. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 12:32 pm by emagraken
Reasons for judgement were released today by the BC Supreme Court, New Westminster Registry, (Gonopolsky v. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Marks & Spencer Plc v BNP Paribas Securities Services Trust Company (Jersey) Ltd & Anor, heard 7 October 2015. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 7:48 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Connection between liquid sugar consumption and greater health problems v. solid food. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 5:29 am
 The following speaker was Chris Hoole, who talked about a spin-off topic from the epic litigation between Interflora and Marks & Spencer over keywords [for a flavour of which, check out the IPKat here] -- the concept of "negative matching". [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 7:13 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Marks & Spencer Plc v BNP Paribas Securities Services Trust Company (Jersey) Ltd & Anor, heard 7 October 2015. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 4:38 am
In the Interflora case, part of the allegation of trade mark infringement was that Marks & Spencer did not employ negative matching when using, among other words and generic terms, the keyword which also constituted its trade mark Interflora. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 8:07 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Motion to dismiss charges — Second Amendment Appellant, Purnell Spencer, was convicted by a jury in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City for the offenses of possessing a regulated firearm following a disqualifying conviction and wearing, carrying, or transporting a handgun on his person. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 8:03 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Marks & Spencer Plc v BNP Paribas Securities Services Trust Company (Jersey) Ltd & Anor, heard 7 October 2015. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 4:02 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Marks & Spencer Plc v BNP Paribas Securities Services Trust Company (Jersey) Ltd & Anor, heard 7 October 2015. [read post]
4 Oct 2015, 1:30 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
On Wednesday 7 October 2015 the Supreme Court will hear the appeal of Marks & Spencer Plc v BNP Paribas Securities Services Trust Company (Jersey) Ltd & Anor concerning clauses within the commercial leases held between the appellant and respondents, specifically the arrangements contained in their “break clauses”. [read post]