Search for: "Spencer v. State" Results 441 - 460 of 836
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Sep 2009, 5:39 am
I thought that's what this country is all about," said parent Anthony Spencer. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 11:54 am
Many courts, including the United States Supreme Court, have recognized a private cause of action for violation of NASD and NYSE Rules, including a private cause of action for andldquo;the failure to supervise.andrdquo;andnbsp; See, e.g., Cook v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 7:47 am by emagraken
Colwell, 2010 BCSC 1040, where he states: In each of the above three decisions [Spencer v. [read post]
1 May 2019, 8:10 am by Ilya Somin
Danforth, Cody Delistraty, Nikolas Gvosdev, Cherie Harder, Jason Kuznicki, Markos Moulitsas, Alan Taylor, James V. [read post]
28 Dec 2022, 5:00 am
  These cases arise out the dicta handed down in the Spencer v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 3:24 am by Marie Louise
Highlights this week included: Advocate General advises ECJ in Interflora keyword reference: Interflora v Marks & Spencer (Class 46) (IPKat) (ArsTechnica) District Court Columbia: Former RIAA lobbyist Judge Beryl Howell green lights BitTorrent user mass-harassment scheme: Call of the Wild v Does 1 – 1,062; Maverick v Does 1 – 4,350; Donkeyball v 1 – 171 (TorrentFreak) (ArsTechnica) (ArsTechnica) (TorrentFreak) (Internet Cases) Danish… [read post]
31 Mar 2024, 4:00 am by Administrator
It may betray personal information long before a Spencer warrant is sought. [read post]
7 Apr 2007, 6:04 am
Acad. of Psychiatry and Law 13 (1992) 2. ^ United States v. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
On the same day, judgment was handed down in Blake & Anor v Fox [2024] EWHC 146 (KB). [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 2:44 am
In Interflora Inc v Marks and Spencer Plc [2012] EWCA Civ 1501 Lewison LJ referred to Neutrogena [1996] R.P.C. 473 that:"...There is passing off even if most of the people are not fooled most of the time but enough are for enough of the time. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
June. 13, 2013), holding essentially that, since those meanies on the United States Supreme Court aren’t letting plaintiffs sue generic manufacturers, we’ll change Alabama common law and let them sue someone else. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  As David points out very early, the Court recognized and embraced implied powers fourteen years earlier, in United States v. [read post]