Search for: "Stables v. United States"
Results 441 - 460
of 734
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2020, 6:30 am
The people of these United States are the rightful masters of both Congresses and courts, not to overthrow the constitution, but to overthrow the men who pervert that constitution. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 5:42 am
Bruen, Dobbs v. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 6:36 am
The good news is that, for the most part, the legal framework both in the United States and internationally recognizes these principles. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 9:01 pm
United States, in light of Caniglia. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 8:33 pm
United States (1997) (and that lurked behind the decision in Medellin v. [read post]
5 Jul 2021, 1:39 am
Part III concludes with a comprehensive analysis of the treatment of kafalah in several receiving States: Australia, Belgium, Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, New Zealand, Norway, Spain, Switzerland, and the United States of America. [read post]
15 Jul 2018, 3:48 pm
On grounds 1 and 2, para 2.2.4 of the allocation policy stated: “Households who have not been continuously living in the borough for at least 10 years and will not qualify to join the housing register Applicants will need to demonstrate a local connection with Hillingdon. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 2:40 pm
United States, 98 U.S. 145 (1879) the Court explained states’ interests in regulating marriage with the simple declaration: “Upon [marriage] society may be said to be built. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 4:44 pm
The independent artists lawsuit Another lawsuit raising the question whether AI-generated output infringes copyright has been filed in the United States. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 4:00 am
A new challenge to the Ninth Circuit test could redefine the key meaning of “waters of the United States. [read post]
28 May 2024, 9:01 pm
More than a dozen1 suits are pending across the United States in which copyright owners are pursuing various theories of infringement against AI platforms, alleging that AI models either infringe their copyrights because they are trained using copyrighted works,2 or because the output of the AI models itself infringes,3 or both. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 5:34 pm
Even the Supreme Court has gotten in on the act with its 2011 decision in Brown v. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 7:47 pm
Part I considers the structures and premises of the emerging governance framework built into the United Nations Guiding Principles for Business and Human Rights (UNGP), and the three pillar framework from which it arose (state duty to protect, corporate responsibility to respect, and effective remedies for adverse effects of human rights), as it has been incorporated into the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm
Texas, in 2003, and United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 8:12 pm
It all comes from, I would argue, this right to privacy that doesn't exist in my opinion in the United States Constitution, this right that was created, it was created in Griswold — Griswold was the contraceptive case — and abortion. [read post]
11 May 2012, 6:00 am
National Director of Public Prosecutions and other government units. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 9:23 am
The United States Supreme Court enunciated this presumption in Troxel v. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 1:34 pm
In the 1970s, identification of the virus, and development of serologic tests helped differentiate hepatitis A from other types of non-B hepatitis.[5] Until 2004, HAV was the most frequently reported type of hepatitis in the United States. [read post]
13 Feb 2008, 5:59 am
In the United States, laws like the Alien Torts Claims Act and the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act have been used in attempts to check U.S. companies overseas activities in U.S. courts. [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 7:09 am
He contended that his case was against Microsoft directly — which allegedly controlled MS Libya — for violating federal and state discrimination laws after he returned to the United States. [read post]
