Search for: "State v. London"
Results 441 - 460
of 4,097
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2011, 3:19 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Shaw & Ors v R. [2011] EWCA Crim 98 (04 February 2011) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Thornton v Telegraph Media Group Ltd [2011] EWHC 159 (QB) (04 February 2011) Everton Football Club Company Ltd v Sail Group Ltd & Anor [2011] EWHC 126 (QB) (04 February 2011) High Court (Chancery Division) Dias v London Borough of Havering [2011] EWHC 172 (Ch) (04 February 2011) Office of Fair Trading v… [read post]
19 May 2011, 1:00 pm
Upon entry into force, it will replace the Extradition Treaty between the United States and Great Britain that was signed at London on December 22, 1931, and entered into force on June 24, 1935. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 6:02 am
Co. v Rafailov, 41 AD3d 603, 604; see also High Fashions Hair Cutters v Commercial Union Ins. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 4:45 am
There are significant gaps in services addressing the needs of children and young people living with domestic violence in London.2. [read post]
19 Apr 2007, 3:15 pm
I was scanning the Court of Appeal judgments, waiting for White v Knowsley, when this came up: London & Quadrant Housing Trust v Ansell [2007] EWCA Civ 326 Now that is interesting. [read post]
8 May 2011, 3:25 pm
TG, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Lambeth (Shelter Intervening) [2011] EWCA Civ 526 The disconnection between Local Authority Social Services and housing departments has been a frequent topic here and in the courts, not least in the House of Lords decisions in R (G) v Southwark LBC [2009] UKHL 26 and R (M) v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC [2008] UKHL 14. [read post]
8 May 2011, 3:25 pm
TG, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Lambeth (Shelter Intervening) [2011] EWCA Civ 526 The disconnection between Local Authority Social Services and housing departments has been a frequent topic here and in the courts, not least in the House of Lords decisions in R (G) v Southwark LBC [2009] UKHL 26 and R (M) v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC [2008] UKHL 14. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 4:36 pm
Richmond upon Thames London Borough Council [2009] 1 WLR 413, at [50] and [51].Soon after, Lewisham decided not to contest the appeal, on the stated (and very familiar) grounds that the decision was “based on the taking of an economic view of the likely costs of resisting the appeal”. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 4:36 pm
Richmond upon Thames London Borough Council [2009] 1 WLR 413, at [50] and [51].Soon after, Lewisham decided not to contest the appeal, on the stated (and very familiar) grounds that the decision was “based on the taking of an economic view of the likely costs of resisting the appeal”. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 12:51 pm
United States, Kingsley Books v. [read post]
1 Dec 2019, 1:25 pm
Royal Borough of Kingston-Upon-Thames v Moss (2019) EWHC 3261 (Ch) Ever since Jones v London Borough of Southwark (2016) EWHC 457 (Ch) (our report), the position on water rates taken as rent by a number of London Councils and Housing Associations under agreements with Thames Water has been conflicted. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 5:16 pm
Roe v Wade [legalizing abortion] was another ... [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 6:33 am
The LOU provided for London Arbitration before a three-man Tribunal, stating in part: “we confirm that the Ship Owners agree that the above mentioned claims shall be subject to London Arbitration … and English Law to apply … and for each party to nominate its own arbitrator and the two so appointed may appoint a third”. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 5:08 am
For the London Free Press – February 14, 2011 Read this on Canoe PIPEDA: Law requires a high degree of accuracy when collecting personal information The recent Federal Court of Canada decision in Nammo v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 3:30 pm
On May 3, 2018, the Centre for European and International Legal Affairs at Queen Mary University of London will host a seminar on "Analysing the Western Sahara Campaign Case. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 7:45 am
Some recent publications include:C.N. v. [read post]
26 Nov 2015, 4:10 am
In Fox v. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 10:23 am
Strickley v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 12:00 am
CD v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWHC 1273 (Admin) Read judgment As readers of this blog will know, control orders have often been successfully challenged in the courts on human rights grounds. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 8:15 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) F (Mongolia) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2007] EWCA Civ 769 (25 July 2007) North v North [2007] EWCA Civ 760 (25 July 2007) Madan & Anor v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2007] EWCA Civ 770 (25 July 2007) London Borough of Lewisham v Malcolm & Anor [2007] EWCA Civ 763 (25 July 2007) DS (Afghanistan) v Secretary of State for the Home… [read post]
