Search for: "State California v. Superior Court"
Results 441 - 460
of 3,612
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2022, 6:00 am
For the first time, a California state appellate court has decided whether businesses may bring takings claims against the government due to COVID-19 shutdown orders. [read post]
6 Sep 2009, 3:06 pm
Superior courts in California handle both types of cases. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 6:00 am
Superior Court, 109 Cal.App.4th 285 (2003)). [read post]
13 Dec 2018, 11:36 am
The California Supreme Court decided today in People v. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 2:25 pm
Superior Court, (2007) 149 Cal. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 6:46 am
Superior Court of California, Et al., specific jurisdiction requires the existence of an “affiliation between the forum and the underlying controversy, principally, an activity or an occurrence that takes place in the forum state. [read post]
27 Aug 2007, 5:05 am
Superior Court [read post]
26 Jul 2020, 9:29 pm
Robinson v. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 4:34 pm
In late June, California’s Fourth District Court of Appeal upheld a Superior Court decision in Save Our Access v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 7:55 am
Supreme Court decisions in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 8:54 am
Immediately after the notice period expires, the landlord can file its unlawful detainer proceeding in California Superior Court. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 5:54 pm
Bounds v. [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 12:16 pm
The Superior Court denied the request and the California Court of Appeal affirmed this decision. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 12:25 pm
Both cases were filed in state court and removed to federal court. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 2:18 pm
Superior Court (Health Net of California, Inc., et al), No. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 11:38 pm
Superior Court (2003) 109 Cal.App.4th 285 and Atari, Inc. v. [read post]
20 May 2010, 10:15 am
Superior Court. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 1:29 pm
Superior Court, S222732 (Cal. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 12:41 pm
Olsen Earlier this week, the California Court of Appeals issued a ruling in Iskanian v. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 7:21 pm
Superior Court of California‘s “experience and logic” test requires invalidation on First Amendment grounds of a Delaware statute authorizing state judges to act as arbitrators in business disputes — when the parties voluntarily select arbitration — because the arbitration proceedings are not open to the public. [read post]
