Search for: "State California v. Superior Court" Results 441 - 460 of 4,008
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2021, 6:15 am by John Jascob
Lastly, the court justified its decision from a California Court of Appeals holding in the 1983 Hall v. [read post]
The law codified the ‘ABC Test’[1] which had been applied by the California Supreme Court in Dynamex Operations West Inc. v Superior Court of Los Angeles ((2018) 4 Cal.5th 903). [read post]
27 Jan 2021, 7:00 am by Guest Blogger
For instance, in California, hackers played music and danced during a remote court hearing. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 9:03 pm by Shaked Barkay
” In United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 7:58 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  “The Book” is the most widely used and judicially recognized real estate treatise in California and is cited by practicing attorneys and courts throughout the state. [read post]
17 Jan 2021, 6:15 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The Ontario Superior Court of Justice differentiated these different approaches to intermediary liability in Baglow v. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 10:21 am by HRWatchdog
Now, employers have a second surprise — on January 14, 2021, the California Supreme Court held in Vazquez v. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 9:52 am by Robert Guite and Sascha Henry
 While the Northern District of California, which had become known as the “food court” remained a popular jurisdiction for these suits, filings in New York outpaced those in California. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 9:52 am by Robert Guite and Sascha Henry
 While the Northern District of California, which had become known as the “food court” remained a popular jurisdiction for these suits, filings in New York outpaced those in California. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 8:17 am by Kelsey Clinton
District Court for the Central District of California, who explained that corporations could not be sued under the current understanding of the ATS. [read post]
5 Jan 2021, 5:19 pm by Kerry Shapiro
On December 18, 2020, the Sacramento County Superior Court prohibited the State Water Resources Control Board (“SWRCB”) from implementing California’s new wetlands and “waters of the state” protection program, and limited SWRCB’s application of the regulatory program to only waters already protected under the federal Clean Water Act. [read post]