Search for: "State of Maine v. Browning" Results 441 - 460 of 659
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jan 2012, 2:38 am by Michael DelSignore
Drug offenses in Massachusetts were made more difficult to prove by the United States Supreme Courts' decision in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 7:14 am by Lyle Denniston
Joyner, et al. (11-546), involving prayers with repeated references to Jesus Christ and to Christian themes at the twice-a-month public meetings of that county’s main governing body, the Board of Commissioners, and Indian River School District, et al., v. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 1:51 pm by WSLL
The Court observed that the town had not in writing or by practice designated its town treasurer to be the official on whom governmental claims must be served.As to the final issue, pursuant to its recent ruling in Brown v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 4:05 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
These miserly limitations on compensation for negligence by state and local entities have rightly received a torrent of criticism lately following the Indiana State Fair stage collapse. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 6:31 am by Jonathan Hafetz
Circuit's latest Guantanamo detainee habeas decision (Latif v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 3:35 am by Russ Bensing
  Last year, in State v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 1:42 am by NL
The tenancy agreement stated that it was a ‘tenancy from month to month’. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 1:42 am by NL
The tenancy agreement stated that it was a ‘tenancy from month to month’. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 10:36 am by Jasmine Joseph
While the Mississippi Supreme Court might disagree with DeShaney v. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 6:07 am by David Hart QC, 1 Crown Office Row
So the outcome of all this was that either it had a good A1P1 challenge or it had no claim – here is the second main issue. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 6:07 am by David Hart QC, 1 Crown Office Row
So the outcome of all this was that either it had a good A1P1 challenge or it had no claim – here is the second main issue. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 1:42 am by David
v=43f2bBjGi_8 Now, that’s quite a quirky repertory, and it stands in favorable comparison to Tom’s: the periodic table, plagiarism, pollution, the new math, the Vatican II conference, and of course the silent letter ‘e’. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 6:26 am by David Hart QC
So the outcome of all this was that either it had a good A1P1 challenge or it had no claim – here is the second main issue. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
R (on the application of Quila and another) (FC) (Respondents) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Appellant); R (on the application of Bibi and another) (FC) (Respondents) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Appellant) [2011] UKSC 45 – read judgment. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 6:02 pm by Contributor
Part I: SLAPPS – A Weapon Against Public Participation During the 1970s SLAPPs were recognized for the first time as a legal phenomenon in the United States. [read post]