Search for: "State of Nebraska v. United States"
Results 441 - 460
of 901
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jan 2016, 6:18 am
There is still more coverage of and commentary on United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 12:48 pm
There seemed to be two major threads of argument in Nebraska v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 5:55 am
Yesterday the Court announced that it had granted review in United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2016, 4:59 am
United States, 389 U.S. 347, 350 (1967), Boyd v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 6:48 am
The case of United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 7:20 am
Wilkins and United States v. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 6:21 pm
According to INA Section 203(b): (1) Priority workers – visas shall first be made available… to qualified immigrants who are aliens described in any of the following sub-paragraphs (A) through (C): (A) Aliens with extraordinary – an alien is described in this sub-paragraph if- (i) The alien has extraordinary ability in the sciences, arts, education, business, or athletes which has… [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 1:25 pm
United States, 48 F. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 11:58 am
United States — how a federal appeals court should treat an error by the trial judge in imposing the wrong sentence range under the federal Sentencing Guidelines Duncan v. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 6:37 am
Here are the materials we’ve collected on Nebraska v. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
According to a Supreme Court case we read (which we didn’t bother to verify), those states are: Connecticut, Louisiana, Michigan, Massachusetts, Nebraska, New Hampshire, and Washington. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 6:42 am
United States, 403 U.S. 713(1971) (Stewart, J., concurring); United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 8:14 am
United States v. 2.28 Acres – United States District Court – District of Nebraska – October 27th, 2015 – This is a land condemnation case. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 12:39 pm
District Court for the District of North Dakota, in State of Ohio, et al., v. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 3:48 am
This ended up leading to a great deal of litigation to determine how expansive the definition of WOTUS was, with the United States Supreme Court in Rapanos v. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 4:50 am
United States, describing the case as “a case about two dueling canons – the ancient rule of the last antecedent, and the newly discovered ‘series-qualifier’ rule, which made its first appearance by name in Justice Scalia’s 2012 book,Reading Law. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 12:31 pm
Plaintiff Philpot later registered the photograph with the United States Copyright Office. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 4:03 pm
Circuit, in Wrenn v. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 9:30 am
Nebraska v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 12:19 pm
China then began rejecting all corn from the United States containing the MIR 162 trait, which persisted for over a year. [read post]
