Search for: "State of Texas v. Trump" Results 441 - 460 of 1,550
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Apr 2024, 5:57 am by Norman L. Eisen
(Some media reports state he was holding up a small crucifix.) [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
Abortion was, like so many things, something over which states had free reign.The Texas statute invalidated by Roe was typical of the era. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 9:30 pm by Justin Daniel
Department of Justice (DOJ), which is currently involved in litigation with Texas over that state’s voter identification law, made a motion to drop the argument that Texas enacted the law with discriminatory intent—something that it is necessary for opponents of the law to prove if they wish to see a judge place Texas back under “preclearance” under the Voting Rights Act, and require the state to have any changes it made to its… [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 6:50 am by Aaron Tang
Franita Tolson –   In NAMUDNO v. [read post]
9 Jul 2022, 5:00 am by jonathanturley
Whether such state enforcement is constitutional will be hashed out in the courts in light of the 2012 decision in Arizona v. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 9:22 am by Eric Goldman
Treating Private Action Like State Action As I mentioned at the beginning, the Texas and Florida bills define “censorship” to mean an Internet service’s application of its editorial discretion to user content. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 4:27 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Cato Institute’s Cato at Liberty blog, Ilya Shapiro and Devin Watkins discuss Buehler v. [read post]
28 Mar 2025, 9:30 pm by ernst
Kelley Student Center on West Texas A&M’s Canyon campus. [read post]
7 Sep 2018, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
Great coverage of Navtej Singh Jauhar v. [read post]
14 Apr 2025, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
On Thursday night last week, after the Supreme Court issued its order in Noem v. [read post]
23 May 2016, 6:27 am by David Markus
Donald Trump may want to do away with Roe v. [read post]
20 Jun 2010, 12:44 pm by B.W. Barnett
Alaska, which clearly held that the constitutional right to question a juvenile witness regarding his pending probationary status trumps any State interest in protecting such juvenile offenders. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 4:26 am by Edith Roberts
Court-watchers are homing in on Wednesday’s oral argument in Trump v. [read post]