Search for: "State v Crawford"
Results 441 - 460
of 1,610
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Oct 2007, 5:56 am
Crawford (07-303). [read post]
1 Apr 2007, 7:32 pm
Whether Craig should be reconsidered in light of this Court's more recent decisions in Crawford v Washington, 541 U.S. 36 (2004), and Davis v Washington, 126 S. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 3:58 am
Last year in State v. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 9:23 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 7:46 am
United States v. [read post]
9 May 2014, 12:36 pm
Although Crawford v Washington held that admission of testimonial evidence from a presently unavailable witness whom the accused had no prior opportunity to cross-examine violates the accused's Sixth Amendment right of confrontation, New York's statutory embodiment of the business record hearsay exception survived the decision in Crawford. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 8:48 am
In a 4-3 decision, in State v. [read post]
8 Nov 2008, 9:54 pm
The state’s Supreme Judicial Court reexamined the issue in 2005 (Commonwealth v. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 11:02 am
State of Indiana (NFP) William Cass v. [read post]
6 Aug 2011, 12:00 am
ROSS v. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 4:32 am
Put simply, Bruton v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 7:43 am
Roberts, 448 U.S. 56, 75 (1980) (overruled on other grounds in Crawford v. [read post]
6 Jan 2008, 12:15 pm
United States (intent element in criminal tax evasion case) Wednesday January 9: Crawford v. [read post]
7 May 2008, 10:06 am
After all, the plight of people who could be negatively affected by the recent Supreme Court case upholding Indiana's voter ID law (Crawford v. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 5:37 am
Of Labor & Industry v. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 7:31 am
Of Labor & Industry v. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 5:29 am
Of Labor & Industry v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 5:13 pm
In Melendez-Diaz v Massachusetts (129 S.Ct. 2527 [June 25, 2009]), the United States Supreme Court held that the Confrontation Clause requires that in order for the prosecution to be able to introduce a forensic laboratory report at trial, the prosecutor must present a live witness to testify to the truth of the statements made in the report subject to cross-examination. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 3:30 am
Crawford, eds., Cambridge University Press (2016). [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 1:33 pm
United States v. [read post]
