Search for: "State v. A. C."
Results 441 - 460
of 39,786
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jun 2008, 1:28 am
Kapur v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks Chancery Division “The exclusion within section 1(2)(c) of the Patents Act 1977 stating that schemes rules and methods for performing mental acts were not to be regarded as inventions should be construed narrowly. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 10:54 am
Yesterday, the Circuit issued an amended opinion in United States v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 7:24 pm
Here are the materials in State of Michigan v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 4:41 pm
United States v. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 10:30 am
State v. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 12:24 pm
State v. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 4:10 am
Here: 2013-08-26 Defendant State_s Motion to Amend Answer and Counterclaim (3) Affirmation in Support of State Defendant_s Motion to Amend Answer and Counterclaim (2) Exhibit A – Amended Answer and Counterclaim (3) Exhibit B – letters from Banks (3) Exhibit C – 2012-05-24 Statement by Counsel (3) Exhibit D 2013-07-11 Chief_s Correspondence to FERC (2) US intervention materials here. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 10:30 am
Alphabet LinkedIn Isn’t a State Actor–Perez v. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 7:35 am
Davis v. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 2:45 pm
(Court of Appeal of the State of California, Second Appellate District, January 21, 2020, Techno Lite, Inc., v. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 11:48 am
By the C|C Whistleblower Lawyer Team In a decision handed down Tuesday, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court ruled that only individuals, not companies, have standing to bring a whistleblower action under the State’s False Claims Act. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 7:30 am
Here is the abstract:United States v. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 3:51 pm
On May 13, 2013 the Supreme Court announced its decision in Dan’s City Used Cars v. [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 2:30 am
On Monday 27 January 2020, the Supreme Court will hear the appeal of R v C. [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 9:01 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 4:30 am
Linda C. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm
See SEC v. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 9:05 am
Furtado v. [read post]
7 Aug 2019, 9:01 am
In a surprising opinion, Mayo Clinic v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:45 am
Koelzsch v État du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg (Case C-29/10); [2011] WLR (D) 93 “Where an employee carries out activities in more than one contracting state the country in which the employee ‘habitually carries out his work in performance of the contract’, within the meaning of article 6(2)(a) of the Rome Convention on the law applicable to contractual obligations, was that in which or from which, in the light of all the factors which… [read post]
