Search for: "State v. A. E. B."
Results 441 - 460
of 10,075
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Feb 2011, 6:40 am
Turteltaub, Robert B. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 7:34 am
CODE ANN. 171.053(a)(b) (West 2011). [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 9:07 am
State v. [read post]
7 Sep 2007, 10:43 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Ronnie E. [read post]
13 Sep 2021, 11:36 am
Doe v. [read post]
28 Jun 2008, 3:58 pm
In John Doe v. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 2:32 am
Pichardo v. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 8:30 am
”[4] Former Clinton Administration OIRA head Sally Katzen states that “[t]he virtues of analysis—as robust as needed, commensurate with the significance of the decision being made—are, to me, self-evident: the regulator must think through, with all available data and in a systematic and disciplined way, all the intended and unintended consequences of a proposed rule. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 4:56 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 8:00 am
Abdullah v. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 9:53 am
State and Crain v. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 6:42 am
Chamber of Commerce of the United States, et al. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 4:42 pm
United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 4:07 pm
CG v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 9:19 am
Weideman Today the United States Supreme Court handed down its decision in Dukes v. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 6:17 am
The Board had denied Applicant ASW's Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, but on reconsideration granted the motion in part. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 7:22 am
See Hallstrom v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
A person described in paragraph (a) or paragraph (b), or paragraph (c), or paragraph (d), or paragraph (e) of this subdivision shall not be removed or otherwise subjected to any disciplinary penalty provided in this section except for incompetency or misconduct shown after a hearing upon stated charges pursuant to this section. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
A person described in paragraph (a) or paragraph (b), or paragraph (c), or paragraph (d), or paragraph (e) of this subdivision shall not be removed or otherwise subjected to any disciplinary penalty provided in this section except for incompetency or misconduct shown after a hearing upon stated charges pursuant to this section. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 5:45 pm
See, e.g., Assoc. of Civilian Technicians v. [read post]