Search for: "State v. Amaral"
Results 441 - 460
of 641
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2020, 3:36 pm
As Akhil Amar has pointed out, either House can propose constitutional amendments. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 12:42 pm
Yen, Foreword [PDF] Symposium Articles Vikram David Amar, The NCAA as Regulator, Litigant, and State Actor, 52 B.C. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm
As explained by Professor Vikram Amar in two prior Verdict columns (here and here), the appeals court relied on two Supreme Court precedents—the 1969 case of Hunter v. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 8:25 am
It is hosted by Völkerrechtsblog and brilliantly co-organized by Justine Batura (Völkerrechtsblog), Anna Sophia Tiedeke (Völkerrechtsblog) and Michael Riegner (University of Erfurt; co-founder of the Völkerrechtsblog), who will feature as guest editor of the Symposium. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 3:44 am
Next is Pena-Rodriguez v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 7:02 am
Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health and Human Services, et al. (11-393), United States Department of Health and Human Services, et al., v. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm
Indeed, the Little Rock case, Cooper v. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 8:05 am
” Julie Rovner of Governing reports that many states are poised to ban abortion, if Roe v. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 11:10 am
Amaral, 31 Cal. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 5:28 pm
It is hosted by Völkerrechtsblog and brilliantly co-organized by Justine Batura (Völkerrechtsblog), Anna Sophia Tiedeke (Völkerrechtsblog) and Michael Riegner (University of Erfurt; co-founder of the Völkerrechtsblog), who will feature as guest editor of the Symposium. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 9:01 pm
In Regents of Univ. of California v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 8:01 am
On Friday, the Senate approved a bill – crafted in response to the Court’s decision last Term in United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 6:38 am
At her Court Beat blog, Joan Biskupic discusses Snyder v. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 12:16 pm
United States, 380 U.S. 24 (1965) McKeiver v. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 9:24 pm
Those scholars who have addressed the changed language of Section One, such as Akhil Amar, have explained the change as reflecting a desire to follow the drafting advice of John Marshall in Barron v. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 6:30 am
What is distinctive about McCulloch v. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 10:38 am
John Manning had the best response to the Amars. [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 9:49 am
One might expect this case would be covered by last year’s ruling in D.C. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 10:35 pm
As Yale Law School’s Akhil Amar has stated: “Virtually no serious modern scholar – left, right, and center – thinks that Slaughterhouse is a plausible reading of the Fourteenth Amendment. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 5:34 am
That said, a right of self-defense, especially in one's home, existed at common law as confirmed by the 1744 case of Mallock v. [read post]
