Search for: "State v. Austria" Results 441 - 460 of 701
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Aug 2012, 5:45 am
Gilmore, concerning the application of the Vienna Convention on the Consular Relations, and United States v. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 2:05 am by Gilles Cuniberti
The European Court of Justice (Third Chamber) delivered its judgment in Solvay v. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 5:22 pm by INFORRM
Although noting that states do have a margin of appreciation in this regard, it was also made clear, citing Perna v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 4:00 am
The decision in Oostergal and Laurentius v. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 5:19 am
o in turizem dd v Bundesminister für Finanzen, a reference for a preliminary ruling from Verwaltungsgerichtshof (Austria). [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 5:19 am
o in turizem dd v Bundesminister für Finanzen, a reference for a preliminary ruling from Verwaltungsgerichtshof (Austria). [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 2:01 am by Holger Hembach
In Robathin v Austria, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) scrutinized a search and seizure in a law office in light of article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 1:52 am
 The same European patent was also in force in Denmark, Ireland, Greece, Luxembourg, Austria, Portugal, Finland, Sweden, Liechtenstein and Switzerland. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 5:05 am by Stephanie R. Thomas, Ph.D.
 Shaun discusses the Second Circuit’s decision in Townsend v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 2:44 am by Charon QC
  The legal presumption in favour of life: Mr Justice Peter Jackson in A Local Authority v E [2012] (Infra) at para. 120 states: “All human life is of value and our law contains the strong presumption that all steps will be taken to preserve it, unless the circumstances are exceptional. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 1:59 am by Adam Wagner
Austria that it would not force states to allow same-sex couples to marry. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 11:30 pm by Wessen Jazrawi
Housing and human rights The Nearly Legal blog sets out three recent decisions from the European Court of Human Rights on the subject of housing, including Bjedov v Croatia, Jarnea and others v Romania, and Costache v Romania. [read post]
31 May 2012, 6:56 am by Rosalind English
Therefore he could have no “reasonable expectation” of privacy and Article 8 had not been engaged (X v UK (application No 5877/72) [1973], Friedl v Austria (1995) 21 EHRR 83 and Friend v UK [2010] EHRR SE6). [read post]
22 May 2012, 8:03 am by Adam Wagner
  In reestablishing the wide margin of appreciation for states, the Court rolled back on its much-criticised decision in Frodl v Austria. [read post]