Search for: "State v. Barnes" Results 441 - 460 of 1,880
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2012, 3:26 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Cruikshank, R. v [2012] EWCA Crim 1519 (03 July 2012) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Activa DPS Europe SARL v Pressure Seal Solutions Ltd (t/a Welltec Systems UK) [2012] EWCA Civ 943 (11 July 2012) Leach v The Office of Communications (OFCOM) [2012] EWCA Civ 959 (13 July 2012) SG (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 940 (13 July 2012) Berent v Family Mosaic Housing & Anor… [read post]
5 Feb 2019, 4:20 am by Edith Roberts
At Greenwire (subscription required), Ellen Gilmer reports that in Kisor v. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 6:22 am
Supreme Court oral argument in North Carolina State Bd. of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 7:50 am by Jay Willis
Florida, United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 2:49 am by Amy Howe
United States as a case that is “likely to be the Term’s most important federal sentencing case, and its second-most important immigration case after United States v. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 8:17 am by Amanda Rice
Alabama Department of Revenue, which asks whether a state’s exemption of railroad competitors from a generally applicable sales tax constitutes discrimination against railroads; and Flores-Villar v. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 3:27 am by Edith Roberts
For The Washington Post (subscription required), Robert Barnes reports that “Chief Justice John G. [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 4:33 am by Edith Roberts
For The Washington Post, Robert Barnes reports that although “[o]pponents of gerrymandering have won a historic string of victories in the courts recently,” “millions of voters will cast their ballots this fall in districts that judges have declared to be unconstitutional,” because “the justices have routinely told states found to be offenders that they do not have to immediately redraw the maps. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 4:12 am by Edith Roberts
The first was Murphy v. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 3:02 am by Walter Olson
Becerra: Ninth Circuit errs on individual gun rights, SCOTUS should correct [Shapiro and Matthew LaRosiere] Assuming patents = property, structure of Patent Trial and Appeal Board may flunk constitutionally required norms of judicial independence [Shapiro and Barnes on Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 5:51 pm by Dr Mark Summerfield
In a posting on the Official Google Blog, Drummond states: …Android’s success has yielded something else: a hostile, organized campaign against Android by Microsoft, Oracle, Apple and other companies, waged through bogus patents. [read post]