Search for: "State v. Bird" Results 441 - 460 of 1,175
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2024, 6:29 am by Eleonora Rosati
The burden is therefore placed on the courts to triage these issues for the time being with the definitive outcome of Getty Images v Stability AI being eagerly awaited.Turning to training, a different perspective was offered from the current state of law within the European Union. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 3:22 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“Allegations regarding an act of deceit or intent to deceive must be stated with particularity” (Bill Birds, Inc. v Stein Law Firm, P.C., 164 AD3d 635, 637 [2018], affd 35 NY3d 173 [2020]; see CPLR 3016 [b]; Palmieri v Perry, Van Etten, Rozanski & Primavera, LLP, 200 AD3d 785, 787 [2021]). [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 4:44 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Mayor of City of New York v Brady, 115 NY 599, 617 [1889]; United States v Throckmorton, 98 US 61, 68 [1878]), or part of a “larger fraudulent scheme” (Newin Corp. v Hartford Acc. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 3:32 am by INFORRM
Stetson School of Business and Economics and Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University The Right to Communications Confidentiality in Europe: Protecting Trust, Privacy, and Freedom of Expression, Frederik Zuiderveen Borgesiusand Wilfred Steenbruggen, University of Amsterdam – IViR Institute for Information Law (IViR) and Bird & Bird Data Protection The General Data Protection Regulation and the Blockchains, Cagla Salmensuu, University of… [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 8:38 am by Dennis Crouch
(I'm not saying here that in fact this is true; I'm merely stating this as hypothesis). [read post]
21 Feb 2006, 8:03 am
I know that it's been commonly stated that KM means different things to different people and if you pressed me for an answer I guess I'd say that KM ultimately means getting the right information to the right people at the right time. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 5:27 am by Donald Dinnie
In Eze v Adderley Body Corporate (https://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZAWCHC/2024/7.html), the court answered this question in the affirmative. [read post]