Search for: "State v. Black" Results 441 - 460 of 10,060
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Mar 2007, 10:15 pm
Whether or not the black defendant's race in Myers was a factor in stopping him, race certainly was a factor in stopping the defendant in Cox v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 3:33 pm by David Gans
EMA, concerning the constitutionality of state regulation of violent video games, and McComish v. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 7:25 am by Kevin
State Farm to Monty Python's Black Knight, who refused to concede even after King Arthur cut all his limbs off. [read post]
14 Aug 2022, 9:30 pm by ernst
Buckley and how civil rights lawyers attacked the state action requirement in Shelley v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 7:38 am by Joy Waltemath
A Caucasian employee who, while drinking with coworkers at a post-training social event, made a number of allegedly inappropriate comments, including calling the company racist and telling an African-American coworker he would not be promoted because he was black, can go to trial on his Title VII and state law retaliation claims, a federal district court in Tennessee ruled (Dunn v Automotive Finance Corp, July 2, 2013, Trauger, A). [read post]
18 Jan 2009, 4:06 pm
United States of America), and on February 3rd the Court will issue its judgment in the case concerning Maritime Delimitation in the Black Sea (Romania v. [read post]
7 Dec 2008, 7:28 pm
In two cases, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals issued rulings emphasizing the rights of defendants to cross-examine prosecution witnesses regarding evidence of their racial or ethnic bias.In Brinson v Walker (--- F.3d ----, 2008 WL 4890153 [2nd Cir 11/13/08])the court granted habeas corpus relief and vacated a New York state robbery conviction whee the New York trial judge precluded the black defendant from presenting evidence (both through cross examination and by… [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 11:00 am
The Court rejected the state’s argument that the statute was legitimate because it applied equally to both blacks and whites and found that racial classifications were not subject to a “rational purpose” test under the Fourteenth Amendment. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 5:04 am by David Oscar Markus
” As our country’s experience with stop-and-frisk vividly demonstrates, however, for police, reasonable suspicion is too often synonymous with being a Black or brown person in public.The practice of racially profiling Black drivers was effectively endorsed by the Court in the 1996 ruling in Whren v. [read post]