Search for: "State v. Bono"
Results 441 - 460
of 963
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Aug 2015, 8:59 am
The court held that, under California law (see, e.g., County of Santa Clara v. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 7:58 am
Katyal has argued twenty-four cases before the Court, including his first case, Hamdan v. [read post]
17 Aug 2015, 5:05 pm
Sánchez Valle, 2015 T.S.P.R. 25, y la opinión concurrente del juez Juan Torruella en United States v. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 6:07 am
Defendant is represented pro bono and the briefs are a delight to read. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 10:19 am
The judge gave a withering critique of the government’s argument that the terms of the original Flores v. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 4:07 pm
On 19 June 2015, Ms Romanova broke her silence by sending a letter to the Court stating that the she could not engage with the proceedings for various reasons, including a limited ability to speak, read and write in English (meaning she had to rely on Mr Kozlov for translations), an impecunious financial position and an inability to obtain pro-bono representation or conduct the litigation in person. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 4:10 pm
Katzenstein v. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 8:05 am
Secretary of State 2012 Muhammad Ali 20112010 Robert M. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 3:03 pm
A few post-settlement developments in the California lethal injection suit, Winchell & Alexander v. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 10:12 am
First, County of Santa Clara v. [read post]
29 May 2015, 8:25 am
Thanks to IJ’s pro bono legal representation, the case went to trial. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 9:07 am
Case citation: Welch v. [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 6:46 pm
The 2008 decision in BCE Inc. v. 1976 Debentureholders clarified that the duty of the directors is to the corporation. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 7:48 am
Citing its recent opinions in United States v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 4:00 am
Therefore there is nothing in the analytical literature that states that they can solve the problem. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 6:05 am
That, plus the fact that the defendant had indicated it would shortly file for bankruptcy, convinced the court there was “no just reason for delay” of entry of judgment (David v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 2:03 pm
[Legal Cheek] * King v. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 9:00 am
Such was the case in United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 5:00 am
Loew’s Inc v CBS, 131 F.Supp. 165 (SD Cali 1955) held that a Jack Benny parody of the film Gaslight was not fair use. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 8:49 am
Attorneys around town agreed to represent the Ds pro bono. [read post]
