Search for: "State v. Borough" Results 441 - 460 of 1,315
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Sep 2016, 4:28 am by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
Article Four further stated as follows:As an extremely loving and devoted parent, I found that the love, care and concern which I lavished on my daughter was not acknowledged or returned in any way by my daughter. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 2:03 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The cases in which permission has been granted are as follows: R (Bancoult No 3) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs Suffolk Coastal District Council v Hopkins Homes Ltd & Anor; Richborough Estates Partnership LLP & Anor Cheshire East Borough Council R (Cardiff & Vale University Board & Ors) v Ceredigion County Council & Ors Miller & Ors v Ministry of Justice; O’Brien v Ministry of… [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 4:01 am by Dominic Pugh
In order to ascertain whether the works constituted “works of repair”, it was necessary to compare the property in its actual state with its previous state (Quick v Taff Ely Borough Council [1985] EWCA Civ 1). [read post]
7 Aug 2016, 2:35 pm by Giles Peaker
On the engagement of Art 8, Kugathas v The Secretary of State for the Home Department [2003] EWCA Civ 31 was followed, per Seldley LJ: “Mr. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 8:05 am by S
The sole exception appears to be where the applicant is close to dying and there is insufficient care available in the returning country to enable the applicant to die with dignity: N v Secretary of State for Home Department [2005] UKHL 31; [2005] 2 AC 296 and N v UK (2008) 47 EHRR 885. [read post]
31 Jul 2016, 12:54 pm by Giles Peaker
YA v London Borough of Hammersmith And Fulham [2016] EWHC 1850 (Admin) YA was in care with H&F for a number of years and was now a care leaver. [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 3:10 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
In this instance, the emergency action taken by the appellant was in response to the state of the pier, combined with a fear of possible collapse from crowd-loading during events. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 3:13 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Hastings Borough Council v Manolete Partners Plc. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 1:30 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
ZM v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Northern Ireland); HA (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12–14 January 2016. [read post]
10 Jul 2016, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Open Justice and Court Reporting On 22 June 2016, in the case of London Borough of Sutton v Gray & Ors v Guardian News and Media Ltd [2016] EWHC 1608 (Fam) Pauffley J dismissed an application by the media for publication of the judgment of King J concerning the case of the murdered child, Ellie Butler. [read post]
4 Jul 2016, 1:45 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
ZM v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Northern Ireland); HA (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12–14 January 2016. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 1:47 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Amoena (UK) Ltd v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, heard 7 June 2016 Bailey & Anor v Angove’s PTY Ltd, heard 8 June 2016 R v Golds, heard on 14 June 2016 FirstGroup plc v Paulley, heard on 15 June 2016 Hayward v Zurich Insurance Company plc, heard on 16 June 2016 Secretary of State for the Home Department v FV (Italy), heard on 21 June Hastings Borough Council v Manolete Partners plc,… [read post]
26 Jun 2016, 2:31 pm by familoo
She expressly states he may have injured her, albeit innocently. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 1:47 am by Tom Pritchard
Summary On 23 June 2016 the Supreme Court will hear the appeal of Manolete Partners plc v Hastings Borough Council. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 12:50 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
MS (Uganda) v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
19 Jun 2016, 2:34 pm by Giles Peaker
That left Di Palma v United Kingdom (1988) 10 EHRR CD149 and Wood v United Kingdom (1997) 24 EHRR CD69, both of which found court as public authority not an issue when the court “merely provided a forum for the determination of the civil right in dispute between the parties”. [read post]