Search for: "State v. Class"
Results 441 - 460
of 28,599
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2015, 8:00 am
In McLean v. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 12:30 pm
Brown v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 4:20 pm
United States District Court, N.D. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 8:16 am
Concepcion, the Court will hear arguments in a class-action lawsuit to determine whether the Federal Arbitration Act preempts a state court decision holding that a class action ban within an arbitration clause is unenforceable. [read post]
26 Oct 2023, 8:59 am
The court in Metcalfe v. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 5:00 am
In its 2010 decision in Stolt-Nielsen v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 8:17 am
Jackson [docket; cert. petition, PDF], declining to determine whether a state court erred in certifying a class of smokers who sued four tobacco companies, claiming that cigarettes containing nicotine are defective products. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 7:10 am
In February 2018, the Supreme Court ruled in Jennings v. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 6:00 am
United States, 406 U.S. 128, 153 (1972). [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 8:38 am
” Vaquero v. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 1:56 pm
State Attorney General Suits: Christopher Curran, who argued Mississippi v. [read post]
1 May 2019, 11:54 am
The Fourth Circuit’s opinion in Bell v. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 6:00 am
In Kruszka v. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 5:10 pm
Brady v. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 11:51 am
The question in this case is whether a named plaintiff in a state class action can, before the class is certified, preclude removal of the case to federal court by purporting to limit the damages sought for putative class members to less than $5 million--the threshold that triggers a right of removal under the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 11:51 am
The question in this case is whether a named plaintiff in a state class action can, before the class is certified, preclude removal of the case to federal court by purporting to limit the damages sought for putative class members to less than $5 million--the threshold that triggers a right of removal under the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 3:00 am
McKeage v. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 2:11 pm
These cases can cause logistical nightmares for the courts, and great benefits for plaintiffs, for two primary reasons: (1) the standard for certification of a class is differerent for federal and state claims, and (2) classes in federal claims are "opt in" classes while those for state claims are "opt out" classes. [read post]
7 May 2007, 6:16 am
Atteberry v. [read post]
24 May 2018, 9:37 am
The United States Supreme Court has ruled that class action waivers contained in employment arbitration agreements are enforceable under the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) and do not violate the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) (Epic Systems Corp. v. [read post]
