Search for: "State v. Congress"
Results 441 - 460
of 28,963
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2024, 9:49 am
The Sixteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution enshrines Congress’s “power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 8:52 am
Corner Post got this case to the Supreme Court by alleging a circuit split between Herr v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 7:25 am
While Congress imposed liability for pure omissions in §11(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, there is no similar language in §10(b) or Rule 10b–5(b).Item 303. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 6:02 am
And in United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 1:06 am
H.R.2690 – 101st Congress (1989-1990): Visual Artists Rights Act of 1990, H.R.2690, 101st Cong. (1990), https://www.congress.gov/bill/101st-congress/house-bill/2690. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 9:06 pm
The ruling by County Judge Thomas Sponaugle in Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture (PDA) V. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
The case – SEC v. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 4:48 am
” The Court’s opinion in Macquarie Infrastructure Corp. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 9:16 am
(See DSM-V). [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 7:59 am
Circuit’s long-awaited decision is State of Ohio v. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:48 pm
Supreme Court decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
”And yet whether we are talking about ballot access (as both Trump v. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 9:00 pm
United States. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 5:59 pm
Of course, Congress designed § 271(f) with extraterritorial effects in mind: in adopting the provision, Congress overruled the Supreme Court’s decision in Deepsouth Packing Co. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 8:38 am
United States, Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes created a meme. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 6:05 am
Mallory v. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 4:57 am
Emphasis on Individual Accountability to Protect the Markets To encourage a compliance culture, Associate Director Stacy Bogert stated that the SEC will seek clawbacks of executive compensation under Sarbanes-Oxley Section 304. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
Rev. 965 (2017); Atherton v. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 2:01 pm
Yes, the statute says that you can remove, even from your home state in a diversity case, if the defendant who resides in that state is not yet served. [read post]
10 Apr 2024, 8:37 am
INA § 212(a)(6)(A)(i) states that “An alien present in the United States without being admitted or paroled . . . is inadmissible”, and the BIA held in Matter of V-X-, 26 I&N Dec. 147 (BIA 2013) , that a grant of asylum is not an “admission” for these purposes, leaving asylees subject to the grounds of inadmissibility (although with the proviso that they cannot be removed unless their asylum status is terminated). [read post]
