Search for: "State v. Constable"
Results 441 - 460
of 517
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Oct 2010, 8:34 am
But in Yick Wo v. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 10:55 pm
The decisions of the Court of Appeal have been followed since in cases involving child protection (A (A Child) v The Chief Constable of Dorset Police [2010] - see our post) and, last week, forced marriage and honour violence. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 6:18 am
(1)A Chief Constable, (2) AA v (1)YK, (2)RB, (3)ZS, (4)SI, (5)AK, (6)MH, [2010] EWHC 2438 (Fam) – Read judgment The High Court has given guidance on the role which special advocates may play in forced marriage and honour violence cases. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 6:26 am
For example, in Khan v Government of the United States of America, Mr Khan failed to convince the High Court that the United States justice system was inherently unfair. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 10:55 am
The significance of Lord Goff’s approach was, however, appreciated by Laws J in Hellewell v Chief Constable ([1995] 1 WLR 804). [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 7:55 am
At issue in the case of Jia v. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 5:00 am
A (A Child) v The Chief Constable of Dorset Police [2010] EWHC 1748 (Admin) (16 July 2010) – Read judgment The High Court has ruled that the gist of sensitive evidence in a case involving a child being picked up for being spotted with an “inappropriate adult” must be disclosed in order that the child can bring a claim against the police. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 3:24 am
’ This interpretation was in turn rejected by the European Court of Human Rights in Gillan and Quinton v. [read post]
17 Jul 2010, 4:42 am
State v. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 6:13 am
The UK Secretary of State for the Home Department, Theresa May, has announced that the draconian section 44 of the Terrorism Act 2000 is to be suspended. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 12:52 am
A v (1) East Sussex County Council (2) Chief Constable of Sussex (2010) – Read judgment The Administrative Court has held that the removal of a baby from her mother due to fears that she was fabricating symptoms was not a breach of human rights. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 7:04 am
High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Jones v Kaney [2010] EWHC 61 (QB) (21 January 2010) High Court (Administrative Court) Mhango, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWHC 1321 (Admin) (10 June 2010) Am, R (on the application of) v The Chief Constable of West Midlands Police [2010] EWHC 1228 (Admin) (28 May 2010) The Law Society of England and Wales, R (on the application of) v The Lord Chancellor… [read post]
16 May 2010, 9:00 pm
Moulton v Chief Constable of the West Midlands [2010] EWCA Civ 524 (13 May 2010) – Read judgment The Court of Appeal has rejected an appeal by a man acquitted of rape as well as his argument that the law of malicious prosecution should be changed in order to bring it into line with Article 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights, the right to liberty. [read post]
14 May 2010, 3:15 am
Supreme Court Sainsbury’s Supermarkets Ltd, R (on the application of)v Wolverhampton City Council & Anor [2010] UKSC 20 (12 May 2010) ZN (Afghanistan) & Ors v Entry Clearance Officer (Karachi) [2010] UKSC 21 (12 May 2010) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust v Roldan [2010] EWCA Civ 522 (13 May 2010) Moulton v Chief Constable of the West Midlands [2010] EWCA Civ 524 (13 May 2010) De Bruyne v De Bruyne… [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 8:39 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) AY, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 762 (27 April 2010) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Muuse v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWCA Civ 453 (27 April 2010) Homer v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police [2010] EWCA Civ 419 (27 April 2010) High Court (Administrative Court) Oxfordshire County Council, R (on the application of) v The Bus Lane Adjudicator [2010] EWHC 894 (Admin) (26 April 2010) High… [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 2:06 pm
Who was it that said "The criminal is to go free because the constable has blundered? [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 1:28 pm
John Ward in a Marshall case that alleges that what is waitin' at the station in Tenaha was not exactly a gal ...In Morrow, et al. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 11:10 am
In Caperton v. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 11:50 am
In today’s case (Amezcua v. [read post]
20 Feb 2010, 1:34 am
There is, however, no prohibition on the court considering conduct which pre or post-dates the complaint - Chief Constable of West Mercia Constabulary v Boorman [2005] EWHC 2559 (Admin); Stevens v South East Surrey Magistrates' Court [2005] EWHC 1456 (Admin); Birmingham City Council v Dixon [2009] EWHC 761 (Admin). [read post]
