Search for: "State v. Cross #2" Results 441 - 460 of 7,621
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Mar 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Finding that the City failed to demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that the arbitration award should be vacated on the grounds that [1] it was irrational; [2]  exhibited a manifest disregard of the law; [3] that the arbitrator had engaged in misconduct or [4] that the award violated public policy, held that Supreme Court had properly granted Union's petition to confirm the arbitration award and had properly denied the City's cross-motion to vacate the… [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 8:40 am by Viking
  The declarant testifies and is subject to cross-examination about a prior statement. 2. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 5:23 am
The 9th does state that such information must be given to defense counsel AND that counsel must be allowed to vigorously cross examine on this issue.US v. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 12:39 pm by WIMS
Mukasey, 534 F.3d at 188 (quoting Council of Alternative Political Parties v. [read post]
17 May 2018, 1:06 pm by Blake Marcus
Rodriguez v United States (6-3 decision written by Justice Ginsberg) Facts: Officer Struble observed a Mercury Mountaineer veer slowly onto the shoulder of a Nebraska highway for about 1 to 2 seconds and then jerk back onto the road. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 1:56 pm
”Apotex’s Second ClaimIn his earlier judgment in Lilly v 8PM, Arnold J had held that the ex turpi causa rule applied where the beneficiary of the cross-undertaking has to rely to a substantial extent upon his own illegality in order to establish the loss claimed. [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 6:35 pm
For publication opinions today (2): In Samuel Hardley v. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 6:18 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Administrative Appeals Opinions Body: AC33651 - Gonzalez v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 11:30 pm by Matthew Hill
This is the second of two blogs on the recent Supreme Court case of Rabone and another v Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust [2012] UKSC 2 . [read post]
23 Oct 2006, 8:08 am by Veronica
The case involved two issues: (1) whether Texas courts can adjudicate and remedy an anti-competitive injury occurring in another state, either under the TFEAA or the law of that state; and (2) whether the plaintiffs have shown substantial harm to competition because of defendants' conduct. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 7:15 pm
State, 253 Ind. 373, at 380 and 389 2 54 N.E. 2d 319 (Ind. 1970), where the Court states that it:takes the position that the presence of a jury would interfere with the proper administration of the juvenile system without adding any appreciable protection to the rights of the juvenile. [read post]