Search for: "State v. Crown"
Results 441 - 460
of 1,869
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Oct 2019, 2:27 am
Patel v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Secretary of State for the Home Department v Shah, heard 7 May 2019. [read post]
13 Oct 2019, 7:47 pm
The Divisional Court recently released a decision in Greenpeace Canada v. [read post]
12 Oct 2019, 5:52 pm
Some of the classic cases, like Buchanan v. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 7:51 am
In a surprising turn of events, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court agreed with the League and reversed the trial court, ordering that the injunction should issue—Philadelphia Ball Club, Ltd. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 7:21 am
The courts are also disinclined to decide Article 14 cases on the basis that the comparators are not in an analogous situation other than in very obvious cases: see R (Carson) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2005] UKHL 37. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 1:15 pm
Kapoor v. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 5:52 am
Similar issues are playing out now in the United States, where the U.S. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 4:01 am
Copyright: Crown CopyrightKeatley Surveying Ltd. v. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 3:15 am
Release date Aug 13 Order a copy in advance. https:/… 2019-09-23 Publishers Say Audible's 'Captions' Defense 'Makes No Sense' – Publishers Weekly https://t.co/LwUCaFwbHF 2019-09-23 OPC concludes consultation on transfers for processing reversing proposal to treat transfers for processing as disc… https://t.co/CKTTM8UiiC 2019-09-23 UKSC rules that the prorogation of Parliament was unlawful R (Miller) v Prime Minister, Cherry & Ors v… [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 8:55 am
Facts: This case (Landi et al v. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 4:09 pm
The Supreme Court clarified this in a landmark ruling released earlier today in Keatley Surveying Ltd. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 2:21 pm
Earlier today, the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) released its decision in the Keatley Surveying Ltd. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 1:26 pm
The Supreme Court of Canada today released its decision in Keatley Surveying v. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 4:00 am
In R. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 11:01 am
The bill creating the greatest buzz has been AB 5, which would codify the California Supreme Court’s 2018 decision in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 10:01 am
Where once the question revolved around the authority of the Crown in Parliament, now the squabbling has turned inward. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:26 am
However in so far as they seek to declare it “null” and of “no effect” he submits that they went too far and where they cannot go. 14:16: Lord Keen QC notes that this principle is consistent with extensive authority and which Sir James Eadie QC will address in due course in further detail. 14:14: Lord Keen QC notes that the Inner House accepted that the principle of non-justiciability exists in public law and that the question of whether something is… [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 7:28 am
In England & Wales, Gina Millar (the businesswoman who brought the UK Supreme Court appeal of R (on the application of Miller and another) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2017] UKSC 5) also raised proceedings, following the Queen’s signing of the Order in Council. [read post]
15 Sep 2019, 7:10 pm
Prior to the licensing of paralegals in Ontario, the Ontario Court of Appeal reviewed the issue of agents in R. v. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 10:29 am
This approach is more in keeping with the presidential system in, for example, the United States, and not consistent with the Westminster form of government, in which an election can occur at any time, with the approval of the Governor General. [read post]
