Search for: "State v. Davis "
Results 441 - 460
of 3,674
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jun 2022, 12:05 pm
Self-service kiosks under fire Davis v. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 4:00 am
Supreme Court overturn Roe v. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 3:44 am
On July 12, 2019, defendants, on behalf of plaintiffs, commenced a hybrid Article 78 proceeding captioned Ressler v New York State Dept. of Envtl. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
[Editor’s Note: This post is based on a comment letter submitted to the U.S. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 6:58 pm
Davis. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 12:39 am
The claim relates to two instances in which Cadwalladr accused the businessman of lying about his relationship with the Russian state. [read post]
11 Jun 2022, 12:26 pm
This is evident, for instance, in the fact that all the Supreme Court's sexual harassment cases have been nonpseudonymous (except Davis as next friend of LaShonda D. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 10:32 am
In that statute, Congress exercised its power under Section 3 to lift the disabilities that the provision had imposed upon large categories of Confederate officers and officials—in essence, all but the highest-ranking ones, like Confederate president Jefferson Davis. [read post]
2 Jun 2022, 9:00 pm
Ferguson (that upheld racial caste) or Bowers v. [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 9:00 pm
” Note that, unlike the text of Article I, the subject of the sentence here is each state, not the legislature thereof. [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 9:41 am
The case is Little v. [read post]
31 May 2022, 6:43 am
It may be that in this regard Clibbery v Allan is now a dead letter and that ;Lykiardopulo was wrongly decided. [read post]
31 May 2022, 5:57 am
On May 18, 2022, the Fifth Circuit held in Jarkesy v. [read post]
27 May 2022, 5:30 pm
STF, LLC v. [read post]
26 May 2022, 11:30 am
STF, LLC v. [read post]
26 May 2022, 4:16 am
U.K. [read post]
23 May 2022, 7:07 pm
United States. [read post]
23 May 2022, 3:58 am
In light of the discretion imparted by the consent form, “the plaintiff[s’] contention that the alleged malpractice resulted in legally cognizable damages is conclusory and speculative inasmuch as it is premised on decisions that were within the sole discretion of the [hospital]” (Bua v Purcell & Ingrao, P.C., 99 AD3d at 848; see AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428, 436; Dempster v Liotti, 86 AD3d… [read post]
22 May 2022, 5:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
