Search for: "State v. Deep" Results 441 - 460 of 4,326
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Aug 2011, 3:19 am by Brenda Fulmer
Last month, the United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in the much-anticipated Pliva, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2007, 9:03 am
  The question presented in Danforth is pretty simple: "Are state courts required to use the standard announced in Teague v. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 4:18 am by SHG
The right to an abortion is one of the most feared losses on the left, it being of deep concern that a conservative block on the Supreme Court might reverse Roe v. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 4:00 am by James Romoser
Briefly: A pair of longform pieces investigates the legal impact of the Supreme Court’s July 9 ruling in McGirt v. [read post]
30 Dec 2007, 8:03 am
On Thursday, we noted that the Ohio Supreme Court had upheld two tort reform provisions in Arbino v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 9:24 pm by Aaron Barkoff
 Global-Tech sold infringing deep fryers to Sunbeam, Fingerhut and Montgomery Ward, each of which resold them in the United States under their own trademarks. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 3:52 am by stu@crimapp.com
The concurring opinion stated that if the complainant simply stated that the penetration wasn’t deep, the Court should affirm. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 6:30 am by ernst
Finally, the notion that federal law controlled infringement of registered trademarks but state law controlled unfair competition arose in the 1940s in the wake of the Supreme Court’s decision in Erie Railroad v. [read post]