Search for: "State v. Dively" Results 441 - 460 of 951
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Mar 2022, 7:51 am by Charlotte Garden
ShareThe current Supreme Court is undoubtedly pro-arbitration – but after Monday’s oral argument in Morgan v. [read post]
19 May 2016, 6:37 am
Diving into this finding, you will find an interesting section on the judge's analysis on how to define a trade mark right - is it a negative right to exclude or a positive right to use? [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 1:05 am by Ken Lammers
Not to be deterred, the Court of Appeals has tried again in Taylor v. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 6:11 pm by Katitza Rodriguez
This is the third segment in EFF’s series on the proposed UN Cybercrime Convention focusing on Chapter V, International Cooperation. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 6:11 pm by Katitza Rodriguez
Read Part I for a quick snapshot of the ins and outs of the zero draft; Part III for a deep dive on Chapter V regarding international cooperation: the historical context, the zero draft's approach, scope of cooperation, and protection of personal data, and Part IV, which deals with the criminalization of security research.The United Nations Headquarters in New York City is poised to become the epicenter of one of the most concerning global debates affecting human rights in the… [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 3:28 am by Jon Hyman
We're doing DEI wrong — via Business Insider Can states legally ban "woke" training in the workplace? [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 1:59 pm by Stewart Baker
This week’s interview is a deep (and long—over an hour) dive into new investment review regulations for the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS). [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 3:28 am by Stewart Baker
Episode 239 of the Cyberlaw PodcastToday's interview is a deep (and long – about an hour) dive into new investment review regulations for the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS). [read post]
7 May 2020, 5:29 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
The AusKat won't be restrained fromlaunching to attack that wrinkle on thesheets.....In a long-awaited judgment that will affect applications in Australia for interlocutory injunctions to restrain launch of pharmaceutical products, as well as claims for compensation following wrongful exclusion of generic or biosimilar pharmaceuticals from the market, the Federal Court of Australia dismissed a claim made by the Commonwealth government for compensation from Sanofi (Commonwealth of Australia… [read post]