Search for: "State v. Dominic" Results 441 - 460 of 4,461
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Aug 2010, 6:21 am by David Canton
” In State Farm v Privacy Commissioner, the State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. questioned the privacy commissioner’s jurisdiction to investigate a refusal to provide access to personal information and her power to compel the production of documents during the course of an investigation. [read post]
12 Jan 2019, 4:49 am by SHG
District of Colorado Judge William Martinez in Doe v. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 12:49 am by INFORRM
Over 70 newspaper editors, publishers and media lawyers have written to Justice Secretary, Dominic Raab, expressing support for the model ‘anti-SLAPP’ law proposed by the UK Anti-SLAPP coalition. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 4:37 am by Gritsforbreakfast
However, the state prosecutors' association's board is dominated by rural DAs pushing more regressive agendas, with key staff held over from the era when Chuck Rosenthal and John Bradley dominated the group's politics. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 8:26 pm
Although decided over two decades apart, United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 7:39 am by Adam Baker
Martel Building Ltd. v Canada, [1997] 129 FTR 249 (FCTD), revd [1998] 163 DLR (4th) 504 (FCA), leave to appeal refused, 2000 SCC 60, [2000] 2 SCR 860, online: LexUM http://scc.lexum.org/en/2000/2000scc60/2000scc60.html Facts Note: This case deals with the possibility of a tort action in negligence for breach of a duty of care during negotiation of a contract (specifically during the solicitation and evaluation of tendered bids). [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
This week in media and law was dominated by two stories. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 9:00 am by Josh Sturtevant
Republicans are dominated by conservatives, while a smaller but growing number of Democrats are liberals. [read post]
In The State of Qatar v Banque Havilland  [2021] EWHC 2172 (Comm), David Edwards QC ordered the report and associated working papers within the defendant’s control to be disclosed on the basis that: The Bank had not shown that it faced “adversarial” litigation when the report was commissioned. [read post]