Search for: "State v. Duis"
Results 441 - 460
of 2,559
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Mar 2018, 10:31 am
The state has now charged you with Aggravated DUI. [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 9:56 am
In June 2016, the United States Supreme Court issued Birchfield v. [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 9:56 am
In June 2016, the United States Supreme Court issued Birchfield v. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 8:27 pm
In District of Columbia v. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 7:16 am
Then in the 1982 case of Cimino v. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 7:16 am
Then in the 1982 case of Cimino v. [read post]
3 Mar 2018, 8:27 pm
” Watford v. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 8:27 pm
As a Fairfax criminal lawyer, I know that police try to use traffic stops as a pretext to investigate for such more serious and unrelated crimes as DUI and drug offenses, unfortunately with the United States Supreme Court’s extensive blessing in Whren v. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 9:52 am
On June 23, 2016, the United States Supreme Court issued North Dakota v. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 9:52 am
On June 23, 2016, the United States Supreme Court issued North Dakota v. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 5:15 pm
A DUI murder charge is no different than any other second-degree murder charge and carries of punishment of 15 years to life imprisonment in state prison. [read post]
CAN THE STATE USE THE RESULTS OF A FORCED BLOOD OR URINE TEST? IT DEPENDS ON WHO’S DOING THE FORCING
12 Feb 2018, 1:52 pm
If you have been charged with DUI, contact an experienced law attorney immediately. [read post]
10 Feb 2018, 11:57 am
In this case, State v. [read post]
10 Feb 2018, 11:57 am
In this case, State v. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 7:06 am
STATE v. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 12:22 pm
Now, you have been arrested for DUI, and the state has automatically suspended your driver’s license. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 4:00 am
Unlawfully obtained DUI blood sample was admissible evidence in Arizona aggravated DUI trial where police acted in good-faith Arizona v. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 2:56 pm
In the 1966 case of People v. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 2:56 pm
In the 1966 case of People v. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 7:11 am
In other words, there is a clear divide between the parties on opposites sides of the “v” as lawyers often say referring to the way a case is captioned with Defendant v. [read post]
