Search for: "State v. Dutch" Results 441 - 460 of 1,320
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Sep 2017, 9:28 am by Victoria Kwan
A brief recap (in Dutch) is available here. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 10:38 am by dawn
A 2013 Senate investigation found that Apple has structured two Irish subsidiaries to be tax residents of neither the United States, where they are managed and controlled, nor Ireland, where they are incorporated. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 1:36 am
O’Malley (Judge, Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, USA) explained that currently, there were three avenues to challenge patents in the United States – through the District Courts up to the CAFC, through the International Trade Commission, and through the USPTO Patent and Trademark Appeal Boards (PTAB) to the CAFC. [read post]
4 Sep 2017, 2:20 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  As of August 31, 2017, the Senate has confirmed including six Trump administration judicial nominees, including one Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, three judges for the United States Courts of Appeals, and one judge for the United States District Courts. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 7:14 am by Beth Van Schaack
For example, in support of his conclusion in Kiobel v. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 3:39 pm
 This GuestKat has noted with interest comments which suggest that this case opens the way to a doctrine of "file wrapper estoppel" in the UK, but wonders whether the case really goes much further than existing UK case law which has admitted reference to the file in cases of "admissions against interest" - see for example Rohm & Haas v Collag [2002] F.S.R. 28  and  Furr v Truline [1985] F.S.R. 553. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 8:47 am by Brian Cordery
Further reasons for this approach were that it was held to be consistent with the approach of the German, Italian and Dutch Courts and that it would apply to variants that rely on, or are based on, developments which occur after the priority date. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 8:47 am by Brian Cordery
Further reasons for this approach were that it was held to be consistent with the approach of the German, Italian and Dutch Courts and that it would apply to variants that rely on, or are based on, developments which occur after the priority date. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 12:20 am
The case reference is Christian Louboutin and Christian Louboutin SAS v Van Haren Schoenen BV, C-163/16.More specifically, the Dutch court is asking the CJEU to answer this question:“Is the notion of ‘shape’ within the meaning of Article 3(1)(e)(iii) of Directive C (‘Form’, ‘vorm’ and ‘forme’ in the German, Dutch and French language versions of the Trade Marks Directive respectively) limited to the… [read post]
22 Jun 2017, 11:00 am by Jack Sharman
The Fall (1956) is narrated by a disgraced lawyer sitting in a Dutch bar. [read post]
30 May 2017, 10:33 pm
|Fordham 25|Unwired Planet v Huawei: Is FRAND now a competition law free zone? [read post]
23 May 2017, 10:45 am by Russell Spivak
  Factual and Procedural Background As stated above, the court addressed two actions simultaneously: Cohen v. [read post]