Search for: "State v. Duty" Results 441 - 460 of 32,072
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jun 2024, 6:31 am by Barry Barnett
utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop Statute stating that “any judgment . . . shall . . . bear post-judgment interest” requires interest on entire judgment, including any portion consisting of pre-judgment interest. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 8:12 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Plaintiff ultimately resigned her position.The Second Circuit (Leval, Merriam and Khan) notes the standard guiding an employer's duty to protect its staff from outside harassers.Citing Summa v. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 7:50 am by Evan George
Though the case was filed in June 2022, disasters fueled by extreme weather are a backdrop to the trial, which is set to get underway on June 24.   In short, the plaintiffs allege that state officials are failing to reduce the transportation system’s fossil fuel footprint, breaching their duty to conserve and protect the state’s natural resources. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Vineesha Sow
Two cases were filed in the United States District Court of the Eastern District of Texas, State of Texas v. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 8:10 pm by lennyesq
”  Whatever the merits of these criticisms, it is not the business of federal judges—government actors with particularly stringent duties of impartiality—to police the political views of school administrators and faculty. *** Read Complete Statement of NYC Bar… [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 7:57 am by Professor Alberto Bernabe
  The rule does not address that, and the comment to the Model Rule explicitly states that the rule does attempt to decide whether the lawyer who receives the information has a duty to return (or in this case delete) the document (or link to it). [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 3:37 am by Peter J. Sluka
  The merger was negotiated while the entire sports betting industry held its breath; the Supreme Court was considering Murphy v National Collegiate Athletic Assn, 584 U.S. 453 (2018) the case that allowed states to legalize sports gambling. [read post]