Search for: "State v. Gaines" Results 441 - 460 of 10,741
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2008, 11:12 am by Paul M. Rashkind
This provides a crucial protection because, as the Court notes, although such a defendant "ultimately may gain nothing from his limited success on appeal, . . . he will also lose nothing, as he will serve no more time than the trial court originally ordered. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 7:28 am by Ben Henriques, Corker Binning
In brief, the case of R v Egan [1992] 4 All ER 470 had stated (without the court having heard full argument) that the previous case of R v Lloyd [1967] 1 QB 175 legitimised two approaches to defining ‘substantial’ in the context of diminished responsibility. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 8:27 am
In 2007, Dana Corporation filed for reorganisation under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code of the United States. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 9:04 pm by Lyle Denniston
  On June 26, 2013, when the Supreme Court decided the case of United States v. [read post]