Search for: "State v. General Chemical Corp."
Results 441 - 460
of 522
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Nov 2009, 2:17 pm
--Court: United States District Court for the District of ConnecticutOpinion Date: 11/12/09Cite: Drummond American LLC v. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 10:51 am
Smithkline Beecham Corp., 240 F.R.D. 179 (E.D. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm
Army Corps of Engineers for another look. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 9:09 am
Co. v. [read post]
25 Oct 2009, 3:10 pm
” Relying on the Delaware Supreme Court’s 2009 decision in Lyondell Chemical Co. v. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 3:18 pm
Example 1: The label of a dietary supplement containing "X" uses the following claims: "The amino acid 'X' is the chemical precursor to nitric oxide. [read post]
11 Oct 2009, 8:04 am
Quantum Chemical Corp., 199 AD2d 899 (3rd Dept. 1993); McSorley v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 5:48 pm
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held in State of Connecticut v. [read post]
22 Aug 2009, 12:56 am
The district court, following our decision in Union Carbide Chemicals & Plastics Technology Corp. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 5:13 am
Ecolab, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 3:13 am
Cordis Corp., ___ F. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 9:40 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2009, 9:07 pm
Chakrabarty, supra, at 308, quoting United States v. [read post]
24 May 2009, 11:37 pm
Micro Chemical was cited:For example, in Micro Chemical, Inc. v. [read post]
22 May 2009, 11:49 pm
In contrast to areas such as regulatory and bankruptcy/restructuring, general IP spending is forecast to go down by 4.4% during the rest of this year, while the amount dedicated to IP litigation is set to fall by over 7.5%.IPBiz suggests IAM recall "who" the authors of "plagiarize with pride" were.Separately, 271 Blog went to Patent Docs for some insight on Tafas v. [read post]
8 May 2009, 10:00 am
: Warner Bros v V G Santosh (Spicy IP) Where do we go? [read post]
7 May 2009, 6:08 am
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp., 252 F.3d 986, 990 (8th Cir. 2001); Hans v. [read post]
1 May 2009, 11:00 am
: In re Kubin and KSR International Co v Teleflex Inc (Patent Docs) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: USPTO, Tafas & GSK request extension for reconsideration (IP Watchdog) CAFC: Patent on sex aid is obvious: Ritchie v Vast Resources (AKA Topco) (Patently-O) (Hal Wegner) CAFC: Assigning patent rights: Euclid Chemical v Vector Corrosion (Patently-O) (Hal Wegner) District Court E D Michigan: LEDdynamics wins summary judgment in LED tube… [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 6:17 am
Corp , 11 NY3d 757 (2008)(wooden planks that were used as a make-shift shelf above a door frame and fell, striking a worker, constituted the type of falling object risk that the statute protects against).Sanatass v Consolidated Inv. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 4:44 am
General Electric Co., 3 F.3d 329, 334 (9th Cir. 1993). [read post]
