Search for: "State v. Good Bear" Results 441 - 460 of 5,149
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Mar 2018, 6:41 am
The tribunal held that a trademark is exploited by the manufacture, promotion and sale of goods that bear the mark. [read post]
17 Sep 2008, 3:15 pm
  And if you think that Treasury might be good at running an insurance company, here's a paper on what has happened when it takes on broad new responsibilities.A tiny bit more on Fed receivership practice: the Federal Reserve Act section 11 envisions the Fed calling for a receivership - but that's for federal insured banks:The Board may appoint the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation     as conservator or receiver for a State member bank… [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 11:18 am by TSLP
If it's the latter, then it seems Delaware has a pretty good argument to make.3. [read post]
28 Sep 2022, 8:47 am by Christopher G. Hill
As the title of this post states, mediation is not always worth the time. [read post]
21 Jan 2018, 5:58 am
The CJEU held that the importation of goods bearing the trademark could not be opposed, because the owner had promoted the trademark as a single global trademark. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 3:34 am by David Whitehead
Lord Sumption pointed out that it was not expressly stated in the ADA that the authority to collect payments was irrevocable, nor was it stated that such an authority should survive termination. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 8:28 pm
In our constitutional system, states are free to make decisions and bear the political consequences, good or bad, of those choices. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 11:21 am by Venkat
When the goods arrive, they identify the goods as counterfeit (i.e., they bear Chanel marks but are "non-genuine Chanel products"). [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 6:35 am by Dan Carvajal
The Supreme Court’s 1992 Quill Corp. v. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 10:01 am by Quinta Jurecic
That year, the Court handed down Hamdan v. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 8:41 pm by Venkat
He has also posted extensively on a recent Ninth Circuit decision that bears on these issues: United States v. [read post]