Search for: "State v. Hawkins" Results 441 - 460 of 490
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Nov 2009, 11:00 am by Chuck Ramsay
  Urge them to become a member immediately to defend you against the state's unscientific breath test machine. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 5:07 am
 This issue includes a special dedication to the former Chief Judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Paul R. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 5:11 am by Steven Ballard
On the other hand, he said, the Prop 8 opinion is narrow in that it's limited to a state that granted a right and then rescinded it whereas the DOMA case, Gill v. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm by Victoria Hawekotte
Supreme Court’s decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 3:00 am
(See, for example, Darren Hawkins and Wade Jacoby, here.) [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 11:47 am
Hawkins, No. 06-4061 "Conviction and sentence for traveling in interstate commerce for the purpose of engaging in illicit sexual conduct with a minor, in violation of 18 U.S.C. section 2423(b), are affirmed over claims that: 1) section 2423(b) is an unconstitutional exercise of the Commerce Power; and 2) the district court erred in relying upon defendant's plea agreement with the government to deny his motions attacking the constitutionality of section 2423(b) on First Amendment… [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 10:16 am by Michael Lowe
  State System The state and federal systems differ on how people are able to retain their freedom after being arrested and pending trial. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 12:47 am by Melina Padron
Kylie Grimes v (1) David Hawkins (2) Frimley Park Hospital NHS Foundation Trust [2011] EWHC 2004 (QB) An ?? [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 5:39 pm by Russell Knight
“Cooperation between counsel and good-faith efforts by them to resolve disputes without judicial intervention are essential to the efficient and expeditious administration of justice in this State”  Spiller v. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 1:50 pm by Geoffrey Rapp
Couvillion, Note, Defending for its life: ChampionsWorld LLC v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 9:58 am by Lyle Denniston
  Their opinion said that the majority has now “declared that animus must have been the only conceivable motivation for a sovereign state to have remained committed to a definition of marriage that has existed for millenia….Even worse, we have overruled the will of seven million California Proposition 8 voters based on a reading of Romer [v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 9:46 pm by Ken
I have nothing against Texas state courts, other than not particularly trusting Texas state courts. [read post]