Search for: "State v. Ing" Results 441 - 460 of 4,823
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
”  She then went on to accuse Democrats of “believ[ing] in abortion on demand up until the very moment of birth. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 6:11 pm
Part V explains the relevance of the consistent approaches and argues that ICSID tribunals have established a jurisprudence constante in dealing with SCEs that confirms their access as claimants in investor-state disputes. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 12:59 pm
Follow us on this quick legal journey (judges, ask a PD to help you out on the law)In New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 9:31 am by Amy Howe
Chief Justice John Roberts wrote for the court in Biden v. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 5:49 pm by Keith Szeliga and Emily Theriault
DCAA’s Organization DCAA’s organizational structure consists of a Headquarters, four Corporate Audit Directorates (CADs) organized by major contractors, three geographical regions (Eastern, Central and Western) for other contractors, and a Field Detachment that focuses on classified work.[14] Overall, DCAA has approximately 230 offices located throughout the United States, Europe, and the Middle East.[15] DCAA’s Headquarters is located at Fort Belvoir, Virginia.[16]… [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Congress has been very clear in the federal securities laws when it intends to preempt state law, such as in the National Securities Markets Improvement Act[44] or the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act.[45] Indeed, such a broad claim of Commission authority might raise issues under the major questions doctrine discussed in West Virginia v. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 5:55 pm by Aaron Moss
But here we are, and to quote our current president, “This is a Big F–ing Deal. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:54 am by Eugene Volokh
Claiborne Hardware Co. made that clear, in noting that "peaceful picketing," "marches," "urg[ing others] to join the common cause," "support[ing the boycott] by speeches," "threats of social ostracism," and gathering and publishing the names of those who refuse to join were all "safeguarded by the First Amendment. [read post]