Search for: "State v. Irvine" Results 441 - 460 of 605
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Feb 2012, 2:29 pm by Leanne Buckley-Thomson
  Quoting Lord Irvine LC in DPP v Jones [1999] 2 AC 240, Lindbolm J noted that unless the law is that assembly on the public highway may be lawful the right contained in article 11(1) is denied. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 2:01 pm by Trey Childress
  Here's hoping to see some of you at Irvine later this week or around generally! [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 10:18 am by nflatow
Supreme Court order issued Friday, two of the justices called for review of the controversial decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 11:39 am by lhgraphics
Phone 888.250.6810, Fax 888.845.6185,  15331 Barranca Parkway,  Irvine, CA 92618. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 6:34 am by Conor McEvily
The Court’s recent opinion in United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 5:13 am by Mandelman
 For example, the complaint alleges that “the challenged provisions of SB 94 as applied by the State Bar…” … unconstitutionally infringe upon the rights of Plaintiff, other members of the State Bar and citizens of California seeking legal representation under Article I, Section l0 of the United States Constitution, which states that no State shall pass any law “impairing the Obligation of Contracts. [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 12:54 pm by Jay McDaniel
In Holding Company of the Villages, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 10:14 am
Laddie J in Irvine v Talksport [2002] EWHC 367 explained at [9] the difference between endorsement and merchandising:'When someone endorses a product or service he tells the relevant public that he approves of the product or service or is happy to be associated with it. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 7:17 am by Melina Padron
HM (Iraq) & Anor v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 1536 (13 December 2011) December 13, 2011 Iraq country guidance immigration tribunal decision quashed as 2 parties not represented. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 11:00 pm by Rosalind English
Sign up to free human rights updates by email, Facebook, Twitter or RSS Related posts: Lord Irvine: British judges should decided human rights cases for themselves European Court of Human Rights defers to traditional UK common law Filed under: In the news [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 6:41 am by 1 Crown Office Row
His at times toughly-worded lecture to the UCL Judicial Institute and the Bingham Centre for the Rule of Law chimes with what the Attorney General Dominic Grieve has been saying recently about the need for primary responsibility for human rights protection to lie with states, not Strasbourg – and Grieve will surely approve of both the content and timing of Lord Irvine’s intervention, on the eve of the European Court’s ruling in Al-Khawaja and Tahery… [read post]