Search for: "State v. Kay"
Results 441 - 460
of 641
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm
The respondent's skeleton argument cites in support of that proposition R v Gloucestershire County Council ex p Barry [1997] AC 584, esp at 604E-F and 605 (Lord Nicholls), R v East Sussex County Council ex p Tandy [1997] AC 714, esp at 747B (Lord Browne-Wilkinson), and Ali v Birmingham CC [2010] UKSC 8; [2010] 2 AC 39, at [4] -[6] (Lord Hope). [57] And finally, Bury v Gibbons was a case in which the Authority had simply ignored a request for an oral hearing… [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 12:02 pm
The respondent's skeleton argument cites in support of that proposition R v Gloucestershire County Council ex p Barry [1997] AC 584, esp at 604E-F and 605 (Lord Nicholls), R v East Sussex County Council ex p Tandy [1997] AC 714, esp at 747B (Lord Browne-Wilkinson), and Ali v Birmingham CC [2010] UKSC 8; [2010] 2 AC 39, at [4] -[6] (Lord Hope). [57] And finally, Bury v Gibbons was a case in which the Authority had simply ignored a request for an oral hearing… [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 10:25 am
’” Kai Falkenberg: She is closely following the pending lawsuit Parisi v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 5:52 pm
United States, 816 F.2d 647, 657 (Fed. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm
The latest decision of the Supreme Court on this subject is an unmissable opportunity to consider another famous moment from Pulp Fiction.* Furthermore, you have written in in your droves [cough splutter - NL] praising our innovative and revolutionary roundtable writing approach to these cases (as seen with Kay v UK and again with Manchester v Pinnock) so we have rolled it out again. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm
The latest decision of the Supreme Court on this subject is an unmissable opportunity to consider another famous moment from Pulp Fiction.* Furthermore, you have written in in your droves [cough splutter - NL] praising our innovative and revolutionary roundtable writing approach to these cases (as seen with Kay v UK and again with Manchester v Pinnock) so we have rolled it out again. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 2:08 pm
There are actually TWO counterpoints, provided by two former presidents of AALL: AALL Works to Support Law Librarians' Interests, by Judith Meadows and Kay Moller Todd. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:33 am
Although Doherty had not been decided at the time that Kay & Price was, the ECtHR analysis of Kay (in Kay v UK) took the somewhat unusual step of referring to Doherty and finding that not only did the Gateways as outlined in Kay & Price not fulfil the requirements of Article 8, but neither did they as functionally expanded (albeit slightly) in Doherty. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 12:43 pm
Kay: commercial case involving Bernie Madoff victims Matthews v. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 1:54 pm
(Eugene Volokh) Howard v. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 12:36 pm
”For a more recent, but factually rather different, § 403 case, see McMahon v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 10:00 pm
Judgment of the Court of Appeal The judgment of the Court of Appeal was delivered by Lord Neuberger MR (with whom Maurice Kay and Smith LJJ agreed). [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 3:01 am
The Court of Appeal today handed down judgment in the case of JIH v News Group Newspapers Ltd ([2011] EWCA Civ 42). [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 2:27 am
This is something we are all too familiar with in Ireland, where we have failed to take action in response to cases against other states when our own law is clearly analogous to the one impugned: one need only think of Norris v Ireland for an example from our past and the persistent operation of s. 62 of the Housing Act 1966 in light of cases such as Connors, McCann and Kay for what looks certain to be a repeat performance in the future unless some legislative change is… [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 10:00 pm
But natural justice is not all-encompassing; where Parliament has conferred power on the executive, it is not generally for the courts to superimpose additional procedural safeguards (BAPIO v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2007] EWCA Civ 1139 ) (Kay LJ’s own formulation). [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 1:38 pm
If you need assistance in putting together a citation from this, or any future opinion using the Universal Citation form, please contact the Wyoming State Law Library and we will provide any needed assistance]Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme CourtCase Name: Grenz v. [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 2:58 am
Kay was sued by many more patients on similar grounds and the state Office of Professional Misconduct and Discipline charged him with practicing dentistry while his ability was impaired by physical disability. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 8:04 am
Continuing the food-related nature of our posts on Art. 8, ECHR cases (see, inter alia, here and here) we’ve got a bit of cold borscht from Ukraine in the case of Kryvitska and Kryvitskyy v Ukraine App. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 1:59 am
The judgment handed down yesterday, Ntuli v Donald ([2010] EWCA Civ 1276) was a public judgment and was said to be expressed in muted or anodyne terms by the Lord Justice Maurice Kay. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 10:22 am
In Inmacs Ltd. v. [read post]
