Search for: "State v. Long."
Results 441 - 460
of 51,495
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2024, 2:00 pm
On July 25, 2024, the California Supreme Court issued its long-awaited ruling in Castellanos et al., v. [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 1:06 pm
Jewish Community Council of Montreal v. [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 10:24 am
The immediate conflict in Moyle v. [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 8:29 am
Reddit case casts a long shadow here, and the court gives the plaintiff a chance to amend the complaint to address it. [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 6:30 am
United States? [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 6:05 am
In Kiobel v. [read post]
26 Jul 2024, 5:28 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 2:00 pm
"Before I was elected vice-president, before I was elected United States senator, I was elected attorney general of the state of California, and I was a courtroom prosecutor before then. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 1:18 pm
Pace v. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 1:18 pm
Pace v. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 1:18 pm
Pace v. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 12:36 pm
John Maloof v. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 12:29 pm
The Importance of Carpenter v. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 12:12 pm
In Hartley v. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 6:11 am
This is part of a remarkable trend with the ICJ hearing a flurry of cases with a human rights focus, from the Gambia v. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 5:31 am
Haaland v. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 3:56 am
Initiative v. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 2:45 pm
”[58] Other long-term problems include the risk for hypertension, proteinuria (abnormal amounts of protein in the urine that can portend a decline in renal function), and reduced kidney filtration rate.[59] Since the longest available follow-up studies of HUS victims are 25 years, an accurate lifetime prognosis is not really available and remains controversial.[60] All that can be said for certain is that HUS causes permanent injury, including loss of kidney function,… [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 2:03 pm
” The court had no difficulty applying Olmstead to the case, holding that the state had to provide the services in the adult group home where the plaintiff lived, rather than offering them only in a nursing facility.The Ninth Circuit held that DSHS was violating Title II of the ADA by failing to provide long term care in an integrated community setting rather than a nursing home.Olmstead does not require DSHS to increase the number of slots on the HCBS waiting lists (see… [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 12:39 pm
This week, in the case of Triumph Foods v. [read post]